Decisions table
Every strata tribunal matter we hold, across the states, filterable like a database. New South Wales matters are read into structured fields, the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Matters in the other states are catalogued from the tribunal register with their citation, scheme, and source, ahead of the same structured read.
1,439 matters of which 509 read into structured fields
Outcome and money figures are computed over the 509 structured-extract matters in this set, all in New South Wales, the only state read into outcome and amount so far. Matters catalogued from the other registers are not folded into these figures.
| Decision | Parties | Member | Dispute | Outcome | Amount | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 82527 [2022] NSWCATAP 328 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President; G Burton SC, Senior Member | By-laws | Orders made The Appeal Panel set aside the July 2022 orders by consent due to procedural irregularity in combining a civil penalty application with general orders, and remitted the matter for a fresh hearing in November 2022 with amended application to seek removal of dogs and compliance orders without the penalty. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 19410 v King atf the Cascade Trust [2022] NSWCATAP 326 | K Rosser, Principal Member; P H Molony, Senior Member | Water ingress | Respondent successful The appeal against the Tribunal's order that the owners corporation pay $70,551.99 damages for loss of rent caused by water ingress and mould in the second bedroom was dismissed. | $70,552 | 2022 | |
| Kaye v The Owners – Strata Plan No 4350 [2022] NSWSC 1386 |
| Basten AJ | By-laws | Respondent successful The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal from the NCAT Appeal Panel decision which had upheld the owners corporation's refusal to pass a by-law granting the plaintiffs exclusive use and enjoyment of additional roof area. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1382 |
| Rees J | Building defects | Respondent successful The Court dismissed the builder's motion seeking an advance ruling that expert reports were inadmissible, finding it premature and inappropriate to use section 192A of the Evidence Act where the parties had agreed to a Scott Schedule procedure and no trial date had been allocated. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 80211 v Control Services Pty Ltd & Killen [2022] NSWCATAP 319 |
| I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member; M Gracie, Senior Member | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused; the appellant failed to establish that damages claimed for rectification costs were consequential losses flowing from the respondents' breach in issuing non-compliant Annual Fire Safety Statements. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 10717 v Mantell and Taylor [2022] NSWCATCD 192 |
| Senior Member G Sarginson | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The Tribunal dismissed the lot owner's application for costs, finding no special circumstances warranted a costs order despite the owners corporation's withdrawal of penalty proceedings. | — | 2022 |
| Kuzmanovic v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 43576 & Peacock [2022] NSWCATCD 185 |
| D Moujalli, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Mixed Premium Strata Pty Ltd was appointed as strata managing agent for 12 months; Kuzmanovic's claim for rental damages of $14,200 was dismissed as she failed to establish any loss from the breach of statutory duty. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 2341 v P & M Sachs Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 304 |
| D Robertson, Senior Member; D Charles, Senior Member | Water ingress | Respondent successful The appeal by the owners corporation against the first instance decision was dismissed; the tribunal's order for the owners corporation to repair common property to prevent asbestos ingress to lot 8 and pay $80,360 in damages was upheld. | $80,360 | 2022 |
| Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan No 61618 [2022] NSWSC 1246 |
| Parker J | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The court declared that article 8.11 of the Strata Management Statement and the corresponding by-laws requiring owners corporations to appoint the building management committee's appointed managing agent as their strata managing agent are invalid and unenforceable as inconsistent with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. | — | 2022 |
| Chang v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 92448 [2022] NSWCATCD 156 | Repairs and common property NSWCATCD LAND LAW – Strata title – common property – maintenance of common property – breach – damages On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 61285 v Taylor (No.2) [2022] NSWCATCD 118 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The respondent was ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty of 35 penalty units ($3850.00) for contravening Tribunal orders made on 3 June 2021, with the penalty stayed pending determination of to whom it should be paid. | $3,850 | 2022 |
| Scott-Young v The Owners - Strata Plan 77303 [2022] NSWCATAP 289 | Costs and procedure NSWCATAP COSTS - costs on appeal - whether special circumstances established On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan 46498 v Evagelakos [2022] NSWLEC 115 | Other NSWLEC REVIEW: review of a On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| Wang v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 88789 [2022] NSWCATCD 157 |
| Senior Member P French | Water ingress | Mixed The Owners Corporation was ordered to pay $3,604.00 for water damage and loss of rent caused by defective waterproofing in February 2022, but claims for earlier periods were dismissed as out of time or made during a lawful deferral period. | $3,604 | 2022 |
| Norman v The Owners Strata Plan No 60182 [2022] NSWCATCD 152 |
| G Bassett, General Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The application was dismissed; the tribunal found no grounds to invalidate the by-law, determined the flooring works were compliant, declined to award the applicant legal costs, and made no order for removal of committee members. | — | 2022 |
| Crespel v The Owners – Strata Plan No 66165 [2022] NSWCATCD 141 |
| G K Burton SC, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Dismissed The application was dismissed; however, between hearing days the owners corporation approved remedial works addressing the applicant's water ingress and building defects claims, and the second respondent resigned from the strata committee, with costs to be determined separately. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 6522 v Sullivan [2022] NSWCATCD 143 |
| R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Applicant successful The Tribunal extended the interim order restraining the Sullivans from carrying out unauthorized works to redirect a waste pipe to the external wall of lot 31 until 5pm on 3 October 2022, finding the works were not authorized by Special By-Law 52 and required separate approval as common infrastructure. | — | 2022 |
| Travis v The Owners - Strata Plan No 48216 [2022] NSWCATCD 202 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Dismissed The application for interim orders requiring the strata managing agent and its director to hold the positions of Chairmanship and Secretary at an extraordinary general meeting was dismissed for failing to properly seek relief under section 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act and for lack of urgent considerations justifying interim relief. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 47383 v McCullum [2022] NSWCATAP 283 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member L Wilson | By-laws | Respondent successful The appeal was dismissed and the lot owner was entitled to enclose his car space under by-law 16 as it constituted a safety device and pest control measure, with no inconsistency with section 58 of the Strata Titles Act 1973. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 77559 v Touma; Touma v The Owners – Strata Plan No 77559 [2022] NSWCATAP 284 |
| T Simon, Principal Member; S Goodman, Senior Member | Levies and funds | Mixed The Owners Corporation must pay their own costs on their appeal; Mr Touma is awarded costs as agreed or assessed but payable only from contributions levied on lots other than his own. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 90018 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1123 |
| Stevenson J | Building defects | Orders made The plaintiff was granted leave to amend its Technology and Construction List Statement to add claims under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 and to include new defects regarding external façade, window glazing, and stairwell pressurisation systems, with the defendants ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the Notice of Motion. | — | 2022 |
| Wells v The Owners - Strata Plan No 12159 [2022] NSWCATCD 151 |
| G Sarginson, Senior Member | Water ingress | Applicant successful The owners corporation was ordered to perform drainage and waterproofing works to the underground garage within 10 weeks to remedy water ingress and comply with its duty to maintain common property in good and serviceable repair. | — | 2022 |
| Boutenko v The Owners - Strata Plan No 77480 [2022] NSWCATCD 166 |
| G Sarginson, Senior Member | Water ingress | Mixed The applicant's claim for damages for loss of rental income was dismissed as being outside the limitation period under s 106(6) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), but a compulsory strata manager was appointed for two years to address the longstanding water ingress issues in the building. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 20427 v A Halliwell Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 268 |
| T Simon, Principal Member; D Robertson, Senior Member | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel dismissed the respondents' application for costs, finding that rules 38 and 38A were not applicable as the amount in dispute did not exceed $30,000, and that special circumstances had not been established under section 60 of the NCAT Act. | — | 2022 |
| Laws v The Owners – Strata Plan 97230 [2022] NSWCATCD 131 | Repairs and common property NSWCATCD STRATA SCHEMES – Whether a member of the committee should be removed from office, whether the Owners Corporation has unreasonably refused to make a By-law permitting the installation of solar panels on common property On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 79749 v Dunstan [2022] NSWCATAP 262 |
| Dr R Dubler SC, Senior Member D Ziegler | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel dismissed the Respondents' application for costs against Mr McCrudden personally in respect of the appeal proceedings, finding that Mr McCrudden's conduct, while lacking standing, did not constitute special circumstances warranting a costs order due to early withdrawal, absence of unreasonable conduct, and lack of evidence as to quantum. | — | 2022 |
| Gokani-Robins Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 77109 [2022] NSWCATCD 164 |
| K George, General Member | By-laws | Applicant successful Special By-Law 17 was declared invalid on and from 14 July 2020 as being harsh, unconscionable and oppressive, and the owners corporation was ordered to record this declaration on the common property title. | — | 2022 |
| Chalmers v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 19378 [2022] NSWCATCD 127 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President | Water ingress | Dismissed The respondent's application for costs following settlement of proceedings concerning water ingress repairs was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding it inappropriate to conduct a detailed factual enquiry into the parties' conduct where proceedings had settled without determination on the merits. | — | 2022 |
| GS & CS Holdings Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 63227 (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 254 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President; G Burton SC, Senior Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel dismissed the respondent's application for costs following dismissal of the appellant's appeal against a Tribunal decision refusing to prescribe a by-law concerning rooftop enclosures, finding no special circumstances warranted a costs order. | — | 2022 |
| Kaye v The Owners – Strata Plan No 4350 [2022] NSWCATAP 248 |
| R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member; E Bishop, Senior Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel found special circumstances warranting costs and ordered the appellants to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or as assessed. | — | 2022 |
| Sunaust Properties Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 64807 [2022] NSWCATAP 246 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President; I Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The appeal was upheld and orders terminating the Caretaker's Agreement were set aside because clause 5(7) of schedule 4 of the NCAT Act precluded the Tribunal from having jurisdiction to determine issues that were the subject of pending Supreme Court proceedings. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1002 |
| Stevenson J | Building defects | Procedural Application to dismiss proceedings against the developer defendant refused and plaintiff granted leave to file amended pleading to pursue claim that the developer carried out construction work in breach of statutory duties under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020. | — | 2022 |
| Macleod v The Owners – Strata Plan No 6544 [2022] NSWCATCD 135 |
| D Moujalli, Senior Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The applicant was ordered to pay 60% of the respondent's costs of the proceeding on the ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed, due to special circumstances including the applicant's failure to clearly identify the grounds for the application and failure to serve evidence in accordance with directions. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners Strata Plan No 79633 v Graorovska (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 245 |
| G Sarginson, Senior Member; D Ziegler, Senior Member | Costs and procedure | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel ordered the Owners Corporation to pay the costs of Violeta Graorovska in the appeal proceedings on the ordinary basis, finding special circumstances existed because the appeal grounds were manifestly weak and lacked substance. | — | 2022 |
| Dent v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 69595 [2022] NSWCATCD 144 |
| Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Respondent successful The Tribunal dismissed the applicants' claims for reimbursement of $10,186 for regrouting tiles and for a work order to prevent water ponding, and ordered each party to bear their own costs. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 89044 v Dreizi Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 147 |
| M Deane, Senior Member | Building defects | Mixed Consent orders were entered requiring the builder to undertake rectification works, with each party to bear its own costs on the basis that both parties acted reasonably and the matter was settled through compromise rather than capitulation. | — | 2022 |
| Constantinou v Dipsellas; Dipsellas v The Owners Strata Plan No 20736 (No. 2) [2022] NSWCATCD 149 |
| Senior Member D Charles | Water ingress | Respondent successful The Lessor's application for costs in both proceedings was dismissed and no order as to costs was made, with each party to bear their own costs. | — | 2022 |
| Knight v The Owners - Strata Plan 208 [2022] NSWCATCD 170 | By-laws NSWCATCD LAND LAW - Strata title - Whether proposed by-law unreasonably refused On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| The Owners - Strata Plan No 31284 v Mustafa, Young and Gallo [2022] NSWCATCD 136 |
| M Eftimiou, General Member | Repairs and common property | Respondent successful The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's costs application, finding no special circumstances warranting a departure from the general rule that each party bears its own costs. | — | 2022 |
| Hill v The Owners - Strata Plan No 16519 [2022] NSWCATAP 234 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member D Fairlie | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal against the Tribunal's decisions of 21 December 2021 and 14 March 2022 dismissing Ms Hill's application for full compliance with section 182 of the Strata Schemes Management Act was dismissed, and the respondent's application for costs of the appeal was also dismissed. | — | 2022 |
| Silberstein v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 55468 [2022] NSWCATCD 114 |
| Senior Member G Sarginson | Water ingress | Mixed The application to strike out paragraphs and restrain use of documents was dismissed, but the applicant was ordered to file amended pleadings within 14 days and documents subject to legal professional privilege were found inadmissible at the hearing. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan 89005 v Stromer (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 955 | Insurance NSWSC INSURANCE – procedure – civil – whether leave should be granted to proceed against the insurer pursuant to s 5 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) – whether arguable case that the relevant policy would respond to a claim made against it by the certifier CORPORATIONS – procedure – civil – whether leave should be granted to proceed against the certifier in liquidation pursuant to s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where liquidator neither consents t On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 18229 v Jakabah Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 229 |
| D Charles, Senior Member; D Ziegler, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal by the Owners Corporation against the Tribunal's order granting Jakabah Pty Ltd consent to lodge a development application was dismissed, with the Tribunal's original decision upheld. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 20427 v A Halliwell Nominees Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 225 |
| T Simon, Principal Member; D Robertson, Senior Member | Repairs and common property | Mixed The appeal was allowed in part; order requiring lodging of a building alteration plan was set aside, but the primary Tribunal's decision not to order removal of unauthorised works and restoration of common property was upheld. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 1813 v Keevers [2022] NSWCATCD 104 SP 1813 structured decision |
| Kevin Andronos SC, Senior Member | Levies and funds | Applicant successful The Owners Corporation recovered three separate instalments of unpaid special levies totalling $44,944.58 from the lot owner, together with interest and costs. | $44,945 | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 90347 v President Properties Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 99 |
| Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member | Building defects | Respondent successful The application was dismissed as the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction under the Home Building Act 1989 because the claim against the developers was lodged more than six years after completion of the building work, and the request to join Stadurn Pty Ltd and amend the application to add claims under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 were refused. | — | 2022 |
| Selkirk v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 2661 [2022] NSWSC 858 |
| Darke J | Costs and procedure | Procedural Proceedings transferred to NCAT with no order as to costs; the Court declined to order the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs as the plaintiff had not acted unreasonably in commencing proceedings in the Supreme Court. | — | 2022 |
| Sultan v The Owners of Strata Plan 4382 [2022] NSWCATCD 96 | By-laws NSWCATCD REAL PROPERTY - strata titles - section 130, Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) – personal property REAL PROPERTY - strata titles – special by-laws – proper construction On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
| GS & CS Holdings Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 63227 [2022] NSWCATAP 206 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President; G Burton SC, Senior Member | By-laws | Respondent successful The appeal against the Tribunal's dismissal of an application to prescribe an amended by-law was dismissed because consent from all lot owners benefiting under the original by-law was a precondition to any lawful change, and such consent had not been obtained. | — | 2022 |
| Dong v The Owners – Strata Plan 44092 [2022] NSWCATAP 202 | Costs and procedure NSWCATAP APPEAL - Notice of Appeal lodged more than 21 months late - No evidence provided to first instance hearing - Application breached mediation agreement On the tribunal register; not yet read into parties, outcome, and amount. Read the source decision. | — | 2022 | |||
Structured rows are read from the decision's own text into fields; fields the decision does not state are left blank, never inferred. Catalogued rows are matters we hold from the tribunal register, ahead of that read. Every row links to the source decision.