Decisions table
Every strata tribunal matter we hold, across the states, filterable like a database. New South Wales matters are read into structured fields, the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Matters in the other states are catalogued from the tribunal register with their citation, scheme, and source, ahead of the same structured read.
78 matters on the public record
Outcome and money figures are computed over the 78 structured-extract matters in this set, all in New South Wales, the only state read into outcome and amount so far. Matters catalogued from the other registers are not folded into these figures.
| Decision | Parties | Member | Dispute | Outcome | Amount | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan No 61618 [2022] NSWSC 1246 |
| Parker J | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The court declared that article 8.11 of the Strata Management Statement and the corresponding by-laws requiring owners corporations to appoint the building management committee's appointed managing agent as their strata managing agent are invalid and unenforceable as inconsistent with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 61285 v Taylor (No.2) [2022] NSWCATCD 118 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The respondent was ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty of 35 penalty units ($3850.00) for contravening Tribunal orders made on 3 June 2021, with the penalty stayed pending determination of to whom it should be paid. | $3,850 | 2022 |
| Travis v The Owners - Strata Plan No 48216 [2022] NSWCATCD 202 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Dismissed The application for interim orders requiring the strata managing agent and its director to hold the positions of Chairmanship and Secretary at an extraordinary general meeting was dismissed for failing to properly seek relief under section 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act and for lack of urgent considerations justifying interim relief. | — | 2022 |
| Sunaust Properties Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 64807 [2022] NSWCATAP 246 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President; I Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The appeal was upheld and orders terminating the Caretaker's Agreement were set aside because clause 5(7) of schedule 4 of the NCAT Act precluded the Tribunal from having jurisdiction to determine issues that were the subject of pending Supreme Court proceedings. | — | 2022 |
| Hill v The Owners - Strata Plan No 16519 [2022] NSWCATAP 234 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member D Fairlie | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal against the Tribunal's decisions of 21 December 2021 and 14 March 2022 dismissing Ms Hill's application for full compliance with section 182 of the Strata Schemes Management Act was dismissed, and the respondent's application for costs of the appeal was also dismissed. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 18229 v Jakabah Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 229 |
| D Charles, Senior Member; D Ziegler, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal by the Owners Corporation against the Tribunal's order granting Jakabah Pty Ltd consent to lodge a development application was dismissed, with the Tribunal's original decision upheld. | — | 2022 |
| Ghosn v The Owners - Strata Plan No 87837 [2022] NSWCATAP 175 |
| The Hon D A Cowdroy AO QC, Principal Member; L Wilson, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal was dismissed and the Tribunal's decision declining to appoint a compulsory strata manager was upheld, with the stay on orders lifted. | — | 2022 |
| McGrath v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 13631 [2022] NSWCATCD 60 |
| Senior Member M Deane | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The application for compulsory appointment of a strata manager under s 237 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 was dismissed, as the Tribunal was not satisfied that the circumstances justified exercising its discretion to appoint a strata managing agent despite establishing jurisdiction based on failure to comply with prior tribunal orders. | — | 2022 |
| Chen v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 7262 [2022] NSWCATCD 58 |
| K Andronos SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The Tribunal appointed Foreshew Strata Agency Pty Limited as compulsory strata managing agent for one year and ordered the Respondent to permit the Applicants to inspect original documents at Mr Kong's offices under specified conditions. | — | 2022 |
| Grasso v The Owners Strata Plan No. 52399 [2022] NSWCATAP 91 |
| The Hon D A Cowdroy AO QC, Principal Member; A Suthers, Principal Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The respondent's application for costs following the withdrawal of the appellants' appeal was dismissed as the Appeal Panel found no special circumstances warranting an award of costs. | — | 2022 |
| Larsen v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 3573 [2022] NSWCATCD 43 |
| G Kinsey, General Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The application for the appointment of a compulsory strata manager was dismissed as the Tribunal was not satisfied that the owners corporation was dysfunctional and that the management was not functioning satisfactorily. | — | 2022 |
| Sunaust Properties Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan No 64807 [2022] NSWCATAP 55 |
| A Suthers, Principal Member | Management and meetings | Mixed The appeal panel stayed the termination of the caretaker agreement and the mandatory sale order pending appeal, but conditioned the stay on the appellant granting the respondent ongoing access rights to the reception lot for essential utilities and equipment. | — | 2022 |
| Chua v The Owners – Strata Plan No 36156 [2022] NSWCATAP 48 |
| A Suthers, Principal Member; G Curtin SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal against the Tribunal's decision refusing to invalidate resolutions and the election of the strata committee at the March 2019 AGM was dismissed, with the appellate panel finding no error of law in the Tribunal's determination that the appellant was not adversely affected by any procedural non-compliance. | — | 2022 |
| Martire v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 42159 (No 2) [2022] NSWCATCD 3 |
| J Rose, General Member | Management and meetings | Orders made The Tribunal ordered that each party pay their own costs of the proceedings, finding no special circumstances warranted a departure from the usual rule that each party bears its own costs. | — | 2022 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No. 64807 v Sunaust Properties Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 20 |
| Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The caretaker agreement between the applicant and respondent was terminated, the respondent was ordered to sell Lots 107 and 109, and to provide the password for the digital video recording system to the applicant's secretary. | — | 2022 |
| Dawes v The Owners-Strata Plan No 93087 [2022] NSWCATCD 117 | Senior Member G. Sarginson | Management and meetings | Applicant successful Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd was appointed as compulsory strata manager for 18 months due to the owners corporation's failure to adequately manage the scheme and perform its duties regarding structural defects and monitoring. | — | 2022 | |
| Australia City Properties Management Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 65111 [2021] NSWCA 162 |
| Bathurst CJ, Payne JA, McCallum JA | Management and meetings | Applicant successful Appeal allowed; the Owners Corporation breached clause 10.2 of the Caretaker Agreement by failing to follow required procedures upon termination, and judgment was entered for the strata manager in the sum of $1,007,896.13 for damages for loss of bargain. | $1,007,896 | 2021 |
| Adendorff v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 16629 [2021] NSWCATCD 76 |
| Senior Member K Ross | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The costs applications brought by the Owners Corporation were dismissed as the Tribunal was not satisfied that special circumstances warranting an award of costs existed, despite the Lot Owners being unsuccessful in their substantive claims. | — | 2021 |
| Read v The Owners-Strata Plan No 2533 [2021] NSWCATAP 218 |
| A Bell SC, Senior Member D Robertson | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The Appeal Panel refused leave to appeal and dismissed the appellants' appeal against the Tribunal's decision not to invalidate resolutions passed at the AGM held on 11 May 2020, despite finding breaches of the Act regarding notice and chairing of the meeting. | — | 2021 |
| McGrath v The Owners – Strata Plan No 13631 (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 215 |
| G Curtin SC, Senior Member J Lucy, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal was dismissed and the application for costs by the respondent was refused, with each party ordered to pay their own costs of the appeal. | — | 2021 |
| Bradshaw v Cooke and The Owners – Strata Plan No 91905 [2021] NSWCATAP 156 |
| Dr R Dubler SC, Senior Member L Wilson | Management and meetings | Respondent successful Leave to appeal was not granted and the appeal was dismissed; the Tribunal's appointment of Bright & Duggan Pty Ltd as compulsory strata manager was upheld because the appellant failed to provide required documentation under section 237(4) of the Strata Schemes Management Act. | — | 2021 |
| The Owners – Strata Plan No 4159 v Wolff [2021] NSWCATAP 135 |
| M Harrowell, Deputy President; A Bell SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Respondent successful The appeal against dismissal of the transfer application was dismissed; the Tribunal's refusal to transfer proceedings to the District Court on grounds of apprehended bias was upheld as correct. | — | 2021 |
| Abraham v The Owners Strata Plan No. 61419 [2021] NSWCATCD 7 |
| K Ross, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The Owners Corporation was ordered to make available to the applicant various records and documents including preventative maintenance records, repairs and maintenance records, hazardous goods register, evacuation plans, and access to Mybos computer records that had been wrongfully withheld. | — | 2021 |
| The Owners Strata Plan no 63731 v The Bunker Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 119 |
| S Westgarth, Deputy President | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The application by the respondent to summarily dismiss the appeal was dismissed, with the Deputy President finding the appeal was not frivolous, vexatious, or lacking in substance. | — | 2021 |
| Lewinsky v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 85312 [2021] NSWCATCD 163 |
| G Blake AM SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful Burbank Montague Pty Ltd and Gornoa Pty Ltd ordered to pay the costs of the applicants for the substantive and interim proceedings on the basis that they acted unreasonably in opposing the appointment of a compulsory strata managing agent and the carrying out of building works. | — | 2021 |
| The Bunker Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 63731 [2021] NSWCATCD 66 |
| Graham Ellis SC, Senior Member | Management and meetings | Applicant successful The Tribunal appointed Wellman Strata Management Pty Ltd as strata managing agent for 2 years to exercise all functions of the strata committee relating to lots 148 and 167, finding the owners corporation's management was not functioning satisfactorily due to improper use of powers and failure to perform maintenance duties. | — | 2021 |
| Newland v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 576 [2021] NSWCATCD 86 |
| M Eftimiou, General Member | Management and meetings | Procedural The Tribunal corrected an obvious error in its previous orders by directing that the compulsory strata manager appointment be amended to explicitly confer all functions of the Owners Corporation on the appointed strata managing agent. | — | 2021 |
| Australia City Properties Management Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No 65111 (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 43 |
| Darke J | Management and meetings | Mixed The Court determined that the first plaintiff's loss of bargain damages claim failed but succeeded in obtaining possession of Lot 179 with monetary judgment of $32,896.13; the Owners Corporation's cross-claim was entirely dismissed; costs were ordered to be split between the parties based on separate issues with each party bearing their own costs on the costs application. | $32,896 | 2021 |
Structured rows are read from the decision's own text into fields; fields the decision does not state are left blank, never inferred. Catalogued rows are matters we hold from the tribunal register, ahead of that read. Every row links to the source decision.