Strata scheme CTS 36246
CTS 36246 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.
Litigation · 7 matters
Avalon Apartments [2024] QBCCMCmr 81
By-laws QBCCMCmr 29 February 2024
BY-LAWS; ADMINISTRATOR; COSTS – whether the body corporate must enforce the scheme’s by-laws against the committee chairperson because he has been instructing body corporate contractors by email from his lot; whether the scheme requires an administrator; whether the applicant should pay the body corporate’s costs incurred in response to the application. Act, ss 94(2), 183(1)-(2),185(2)(a), 270(1)(c); Accommodation Module, ss 47(3)(b), 50, 60(3).
Avalon Apartments [2023] QBCCMCmr 111
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 16 March 2023
ACCESS TO RECORDS – where lot owner requested copies of body corporate records – where lot owner made a second request with revised dates – where lot owner applied for adjudication orders for compliance with the revised request without allowing 7 days for the Body Corporate to comply with the revised request – whether there is a dispute to be resolved – where the body corporate provided access to the records stored on a server and in electronic format – where the applicant preferred a different electronic format and platform – whether the body corporate provided the records – where the applicant contends the requested records are incomplete – where the body corporate says it provided all the relevant documents which actually exist – whether there is sufficient basis to find that the body corporate did not fully comply with the request COSTS – whether costs order ought to be made against applicant Act, s 205; 270(3)
Avalon Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 455
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 December 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from putting a committee resolution and general meeting resolution into effect pending the outcome of a challenge to the validity of the meetings that passed them. Act, ss 119, 279(1), 309; Accommodation Module, ss 46, 47, 63(6)(e)(ii), 72(1), 77(3)(d), 102(4)(c), 130(1), 162, 163(1)(a).
Avalon Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 113
Other QBCCMCmr 23 March 2022
BODY CORPORATE ROLL – ACCESS TO RECORDS – where applicant lot owner requested copy of roll – where body corporate supplied copy of roll – where applicant alleges roll missing certain information – whether body corporate failed to comply with obligation to provide access to records – whether body corporate has obligation to seek alleged incomplete details from owner. Act, s 205; Accommodation Module, ss 212, 213
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 510
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 11 November 2021
COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS – whether motions passed by the committee outside a meeting were valid – GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURES – whether a general meeting was validly called – whether votes were validly cast at a general meeting. Act, s 100(5); Accommodation Module 2008, ss 53-4, 84-5, 149-51
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 435
By-laws QBCCMCmr 15 September 2021
BY-LAWS – whether the body corporate must enforce a flooring by-law that is no longer in effect; whether the committee resolution to retrospectively approve the floor was invalid. COMMITTEE PROCEDURES – whether the committee is making decisions as required by the Accommodation Module. Act, ss 94(1)(b), 100(5), 270(1)(c), (3) & (4); Accommodation Module, ss 60(3), 61(1)(a).
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 69
Other QBCCMCmr 12 February 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.