Strata scheme CTS 36246

CTS 36246 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about by-laws
$6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

7 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $700 per lot

Expected $6,300 per lot

Worst case $24,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$700	$6,300	$24,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 36246 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Avalon Apartments [2024] QBCCMCmr 81
By-laws QBCCMCmr 29 February 2024

BY-LAWS; ADMINISTRATOR; COSTS – whether the body corporate must enforce the scheme’s by-laws against the committee chairperson because he has been instructing body corporate contractors by email from his lot; whether the scheme requires an administrator; whether the applicant should pay the body corporate’s costs incurred in response to the application. Act, ss 94(2), 183(1)-(2),185(2)(a), 270(1)(c); Accommodation Module, ss 47(3)(b), 50, 60(3).
Avalon Apartments [2023] QBCCMCmr 111
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 16 March 2023

ACCESS TO RECORDS – where lot owner requested copies of body corporate records – where lot owner made a second request with revised dates – where lot owner applied for adjudication orders for compliance with the revised request without allowing 7 days for the Body Corporate to comply with the revised request – whether there is a dispute to be resolved – where the body corporate provided access to the records stored on a server and in electronic format – where the applicant preferred a different electronic format and platform – whether the body corporate provided the records – where the applicant contends the requested records are incomplete – where the body corporate says it provided all the relevant documents which actually exist – whether there is sufficient basis to find that the body corporate did not fully comply with the request COSTS – whether costs order ought to be made against applicant Act, s 205; 270(3)
Avalon Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 455
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 December 2022

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from putting a committee resolution and general meeting resolution into effect pending the outcome of a challenge to the validity of the meetings that passed them. Act, ss 119, 279(1), 309; Accommodation Module, ss 46, 47, 63(6)(e)(ii), 72(1), 77(3)(d), 102(4)(c), 130(1), 162, 163(1)(a).
Avalon Apartments [2022] QBCCMCmr 113
Other QBCCMCmr 23 March 2022

BODY CORPORATE ROLL – ACCESS TO RECORDS – where applicant lot owner requested copy of roll – where body corporate supplied copy of roll – where applicant alleges roll missing certain information – whether body corporate failed to comply with obligation to provide access to records – whether body corporate has obligation to seek alleged incomplete details from owner. Act, s 205; Accommodation Module, ss 212, 213
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 510
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 11 November 2021

COMMITTEE RESOLUTIONS – whether motions passed by the committee outside a meeting were valid – GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURES – whether a general meeting was validly called – whether votes were validly cast at a general meeting. Act, s 100(5); Accommodation Module 2008, ss 53-4, 84-5, 149-51
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 435
By-laws QBCCMCmr 15 September 2021

BY-LAWS – whether the body corporate must enforce a flooring by-law that is no longer in effect; whether the committee resolution to retrospectively approve the floor was invalid. COMMITTEE PROCEDURES – whether the committee is making decisions as required by the Accommodation Module. Act, ss 94(1)(b), 100(5), 270(1)(c), (3) & (4); Accommodation Module, ss 60(3), 61(1)(a).
Avalon Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 69
Other QBCCMCmr 12 February 2021

INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	7 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.