← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 31609

CTS 31609 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Elevated
Good case $8,700 per lot
Expected $31,300 per lot
Worst case $104,900 per lot
  • Serious building-defect rectification

    Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.

    $25,000
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.

    $6,300

Litigation · 7 matters

  • Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 269

    Building defects QBCCMCmr 24 July 2024

    MAINTENANCE – where the body corporate resolved to paint the entire building with the costs to come from the sinking fund – where the applicant says maintenance of the balconies, patios and exclusive use areas are owners’ responsibilities – whether the painting and remedial works are required to maintain the elements of the building in a structurally sound condition – whether the body corporate can validly incur the cost of the work – whether the sinking fund budget is valid. Act s94(2); Accommodation Module ss 150(3), 170(2), 182(2)&(3), 200

  • Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 136

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 5 April 2024

    BY-LAWS – where the applicant alleges the committee breached the defamation by-law – REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate should have issued the applicant and other lot owners with by-law contravention notices – COSTS – whether costs should be awarded to the respondent. Act, ss 94(2), 100, 183, 270; Accommodation Module, ss 63(1),(2) and (6)

  • Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 103

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 18 March 2024

    REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate commissioned a report and repaired two windows in a boundary wall and one window and two doors that were part of a lot, whether the committee acted reasonably in the circumstances in making decisions about maintenance obligations and to apportion the total cost of the report to the body corporate, and only apportion 20% of the costs of the repairs to the lot owner – whether orders sought are warranted. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 160, 161, 280; Accommodation Module, ss 170, 200, 201(3), 202

  • Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 4

    Other QBCCMCmr 8 January 2024

    RECORDS – whether the body corporate failed to provide body corporate records to the applicant. Act, s 205; Accommodation Module, ss 220, 222

  • Waves [2023] QBCCMCmr 505

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 22 December 2023

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from implementing resolution to proceed with painting works. Act, s279

  • Waves [2023] QBCCMCmr 94

    Other QBCCMCmr 3 March 2023

    Whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279.

  • Waves [2022] QBCCMCmr 409

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 15 November 2022

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the respondents ought to be prevented from acting upon committee and ordinary resolutions to remove a fence from within an exclusive use area because it may amount to a disposal of common property requiring authorisation by resolution without dissent. Act, s 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 44(1)(d), 174(2)(a)(i), 180(1)(c), 183.

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts7 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS31609