Strata scheme CTS 31609

CTS 31609 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
$31,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

7 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Building-defect dispute on record

A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.

Cost exposure

Elevated exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $8,700 per lot

Expected $31,300 per lot

Worst case $104,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.	$8,000	$25,000	$80,000
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$8,700	$31,300	$104,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?

Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
2
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?

Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
3
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
4
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
5
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
6
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 31609 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 269
Building defects QBCCMCmr 24 July 2024

MAINTENANCE – where the body corporate resolved to paint the entire building with the costs to come from the sinking fund – where the applicant says maintenance of the balconies, patios and exclusive use areas are owners’ responsibilities – whether the painting and remedial works are required to maintain the elements of the building in a structurally sound condition – whether the body corporate can validly incur the cost of the work – whether the sinking fund budget is valid. Act s94(2); Accommodation Module ss 150(3), 170(2), 182(2)&(3), 200
Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 136
By-laws QBCCMCmr 5 April 2024

BY-LAWS – where the applicant alleges the committee breached the defamation by-law – REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate should have issued the applicant and other lot owners with by-law contravention notices – COSTS – whether costs should be awarded to the respondent. Act, ss 94(2), 100, 183, 270; Accommodation Module, ss 63(1),(2) and (6)
Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 103
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 18 March 2024

REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate commissioned a report and repaired two windows in a boundary wall and one window and two doors that were part of a lot, whether the committee acted reasonably in the circumstances in making decisions about maintenance obligations and to apportion the total cost of the report to the body corporate, and only apportion 20% of the costs of the repairs to the lot owner – whether orders sought are warranted. Act, ss 94, 100(5), 160, 161, 280; Accommodation Module, ss 170, 200, 201(3), 202
Waves [2024] QBCCMCmr 4
Other QBCCMCmr 8 January 2024

RECORDS – whether the body corporate failed to provide body corporate records to the applicant. Act, s 205; Accommodation Module, ss 220, 222
Waves [2023] QBCCMCmr 505
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 22 December 2023

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from implementing resolution to proceed with painting works. Act, s279
Waves [2023] QBCCMCmr 94
Other QBCCMCmr 3 March 2023

Whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279.
Waves [2022] QBCCMCmr 409
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 15 November 2022

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the respondents ought to be prevented from acting upon committee and ordinary resolutions to remove a fence from within an exclusive use area because it may amount to a disposal of common property requiring authorisation by resolution without dissent. Act, s 279(1); Accommodation Module, ss 44(1)(d), 174(2)(a)(i), 180(1)(c), 183.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	7 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.