← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 9098

CTS 9098 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 8 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Moderate
Good case $700 per lot
Expected $6,300 per lot
Worst case $24,900 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 8 matters.

    $6,300

Litigation · 8 matters

  • Royal Palm [2024] QBCCMCmr 458

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 11 December 2024

    INTERIM ORDER – whether warranted; REASONABLENESS of committee failing to respond to request to vary access condition for keeping pets on basis of new report. Act, ss 100(5), 279

  • Royal Palm [2024] QBCCMCmr 459

    Other QBCCMCmr 11 December 2024

    REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate committee has imposed an access condition on the applicant’s approval for her dog – whether it was unreasonable for the body corporate to have imposed the condition. Act, ss 94, 100, 242

  • Royal Palm [2024] QBCCMCmr 371

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 14 October 2024

    INTERIM ORDER – whether warranted - where committee has refused to reconsider access conditions it imposed on the applicant’s pet approval. Act, ss 100(5), 279

  • Royal Palm [2024] QBCCMCmr 262

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 18 July 2024

    REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate committee has refused to amend the access condition it imposed on the applicant’s pet approval – whether the orders sought by the applicant are warranted in the circumstances. Act, ss 94; 100

  • Royal Palm [2024] QBCCMCmr 10

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 15 January 2024

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the body corporate has imposed entry and exit access conditions on the applicant’s pet approval – where the applicant argues the entry and exit conditions are oppressive and unreasonable – whether the circumstances warrant granting an interim order in this case. Act, ss 94, 100

  • Royal Palm [2023] QBCCMCmr 460

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 24 November 2023

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where the body corporate has refused to reconsider the entry and exit access conditions it imposed on the applicant’s pet approval – whether the circumstances warrant granting an interim order in this case. Act, ss 94; 100

  • Royal Palm [2023] QBCCMCmr 211

    Other QBCCMCmr 31 May 2023

    REASONABLENESS – where committee gave approval for owners to keep a dog, subject to a requirement to enter and exit the scheme with the dog via the carpark vehicular ramp and not via the main ground floor list lobby – whether the access condition was unreasonable. Act, s 100(5)

  • Royal Palm [2022] QBCCMCmr 126

    Other QBCCMCmr 5 April 2022

    INTERIM ORDER – where applicant owner received committee approval to keep a dog, subject to requirement that exit and entry of the dog from the scheme land be via the car park driveway ramp – where applicant says pedestrian use of the driveway is dangerous and therefore the requirement is unreasonable – whether to grant interim order to exempt applicants from requirement. Act, s 279

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts8 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS9098