Strata scheme CTS 8790

CTS 8790 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 10 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

10 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
$6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

10 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $700 per lot

Expected $6,300 per lot

Worst case $24,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 10 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 10 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$700	$6,300	$24,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 10 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 8790 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Atlantis West [2026] QBCCMCmr 5
Other QBCCMCmr 13 January 2026

ACCESS TO A LOT – where the body corporate has issued an entry notice seeking access to the respondent’s lot to facilitate balustrade replacement works at the scheme – where access has been refused – whether orders for access are required. Act, s 163
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 386
Other QBCCMCmr 23 October 2024

ACCESS TO A LOT – whether body corporate is required to compensate owner for inability to use part of the lot whilst works authorised by the body corporate are performed. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 156, 163; Standard Module, ss 52, 189
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 340
Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 18 September 2024

CARETAKING SERVICE CONTRACTOR - ENGAGEMENTS AND AUTHORISATIONS – RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PROPRIETORS – whether decision of body corporate to extend Caretaking Service Agreement was valid STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – USE OF EXTRINSIC MATERIAL Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld), ss. 94, 122, 227, 229, 318. Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s. 14A, 14B, 32C. Statutory Instruments Act 1992, s 14 Body Corporate and Community Management (Standard Module) Regulation 2020 (Qld), ss. 135, 136, 140, 141 Explanatory Notes, Body Corporate and Community Management Legislation Amendment Regulation(No 1) 2003 (Qld) Lill v Ryan [[2011] QCATA 124](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2011/124.html "View Case") Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld) [[2011] HCA 10](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/10.html "View Case"); (2011) 242 CLR 573 Minister for Immigration v SZAYW [[2005] FCAFC 154](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2005/154.html "View Case"); (2005) 145 FCR 523 Strata Plan No. 74602 v Eastmark Holdings Pty Ltd [](../../../../BCCM/Appeal%20&%20External%20Decisions/External%20decisions/The%20Owners%20-%20Strata%20Plan%20No.%2074602%20v%20Eastmark%20Holdings%20Pty%20Limited%20%5b2013%5d%20NSWCA%20221.pdf)[[2013] NSWCA 221](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2013/221.html "View Case")
Atlantis West [2024] QBCCMCmr 183
Other QBCCMCmr 17 May 2024

ACCESS TO A LOT – where the body corporate issued an entry notice seeking access to the respondent’s lot for an extended period for balustrade replacement works at the scheme – where the respondent objected to the extent of access sought – whether the extent of access sought is reasonably necessary - whether orders for access are required. Act, s 163
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 335
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 7 September 2022

AGM RESOLUTION; DISPOSITION OF COMMON PROPERTY – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably when deciding against a motion to grant the applicant a three year licence to part of the common property adjoining its lot; whether the body corporate has acquiesced to the applicant’s use of the area; whether the applicant has an actual or implied licence to the area; where the applicant has had sole use of the area since purchasing at the scheme in 1999. Act, ss 94(2), 242; Standard Module, s 184(2)(b).
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 93
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 March 2022

RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT – where a motion proposed that exclusive use be granted for benefit of a lot on 16th floor, for use as foyer area– where the motion failed to achieve a resolution without dissent – whether the opposition to the motion was unreasonable in the circumstances. Section 276(3) Act & Schedule 5 Item 10, Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997. Body Corporate for Viridian; Ainsworth & ors v Albrecht & Anor [[2014] QCATA 294](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2014/294.html "View Case") Ainsworth & Ors v Albrecht & Anor [[2016] HCA 40](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/40.html "View Case")
Atlantis West [2022] QBCCMCmr 16
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 19 January 2022

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented, pending final orders, from implementing a general meeting resolution to issue a by-law contravention notice to the applicant and seek the removal of a partition from common property; where the applicant argues that a motion to grant it a licence to the relevant area of common property should be deemed passed, and the motion to issue the contravention notice and remove the partition should be declared invalid. Act, ss 94(2), 101(2), 242, 279; Standard Module, s 184(2)(b).
Atlantis West [2021] QBCCMCmr 341
Other QBCCMCmr 12 July 2021

CHANGE OF FINANCIAL YEAR – application to change the financial year end date of the Body Corporate Act, s 283
Atlantis West [2021] QBCCMCmr 241
Other QBCCMCmr 19 May 2021

RECORDS – where the applicant seeks a copy of specific correspondence to the body corporate – where it was not found in a search of the records – whether the document exists – whether the body corporate has failed to provide access to the records. Act, s 205
Atlantis West [2020] QBCCMCmr 233
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 8 May 2020

APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDER – where applicant seeks to invalidate a resolution to appoint a body corporate manager - whether the engagement has been properly authorised by the body corporate- whether an interim order is warranted in the circumstances. Act ss 227, 228, 276, 279.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	10 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.