Strata scheme CTS 6203
CTS 6203 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 11 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 11 matters.
Litigation · 11 matters
Contessa Condominiums [2024] QBCCMCmr 266
Building defects QBCCMCmr 22 July 2024
ACCESS TO A LOT – whether the body corporate may erect scaffolding on a lot balcony during structural repairs to a slab on a higher level. Act, s 163; Standard Module, s 180(2)(b)(ii)-(iii).
Contessa Condominiums [2024] QBCCMCmr 267
By-laws QBCCMCmr 22 July 2024
BY-LAWS – where the respondents have installed hard flooring in their lot – whether the respondents have complied with the hard flooring by-laws. Act, ss 180 to 186
Contessa Condominiums [2024] QBCCMCmr 226
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 18 June 2024
GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – where the body corporate approved works and a special levy to fund those works – where the body corporate deferred the works to review the scope of works – where the body corporate raised the special levy – whether the motions were valid – whether the levies should be refunded. Act, s 242; Standard Module, s 116
Contessa Condominiums [2023] QBCCMCmr 127
Other QBCCMCmr 23 March 2023
CONSENT ORDER – whether an order should be made by consent. Act, ss 270(1)(b), 276(5)
Contessa Condominiums [2023] QBCCMCmr 128
Other QBCCMCmr 23 March 2023
CONSENT ORDER –whether an order should be made by consent . Act, ss 270(1)(b), 276(5)
Contessa Condominiums [2022] QBCCMCmr 111
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 22 March 2022
POWER TO ENTER LOT \- Whether the body corporate may enter a lot to replace pipework \- Whether entry is “reasonably necessary” \- Whether proposed work is “work the body corporate is authorised or required to carry out” \- Whether pipework is common property utility infrastructure \- Statutory Easements Act, ss 20, 94(2), 163, Sched. 6 Land Title Act 1994 ss 115O, 115P
Contessa Condominiums [2021] QBCCMCmr 442
Other QBCCMCmr 21 September 2021
POWER TO ENTER LOTS – whether the body corporate may enter a lot and affix a mast climber to it to facilitate work to other lots. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 163.
Contessa Condominiums [2021] QBCCMCmr 443
Other QBCCMCmr 21 September 2021
POWER TO ENTER LOTS – whether the body corporate may enter a lot and affix a mast climber to it to facilitate work to other lots. Act, s 163; Standard Module, s 180.
Contessa Condominiums [2021] QBCCMCmr 444
Other QBCCMCmr 21 September 2021
POWER TO ENTER LOTS – whether the body corporate may enter a lot and install a mast climber to facilitate work to other lots. Act, ss 94(2), 163.
Contessa Condominiums [2021] QBCCMCmr 418
Other QBCCMCmr 3 September 2021
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether an interim order should be made to prevent the body corporate from erecting a mast climber within the applicant’s lot until it can be determined whether it is reasonably necessary and therefore a valid exercise of the body corporate’s power of entry. Act, ss 94(2), 163, 279(1).
Contessa Condominiums [2021] QBCCMCmr 331
Building defects QBCCMCmr 6 July 2021
EMERGENCY EXPENDITURE – whether the body corporate committee should be authorised to exceed its spending limit without the authority of an ordinary resolution to repair structural and waterproofing damage to a lot that has caused hazardous mould in a neighbouring lot. Act, ss 243A(1)(a); Standard Module, ss 91, 172, 173.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 11 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.