Strata scheme CTS 5721
CTS 5721 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Victoria Square [2024] QBCCMCmr 387
Building defects QBCCMCmr 23 October 2024
DISMISSAL – ADJUDICATORS POWERS – ECONOMIC LOSS –CONSENT ORDERS The applicant lot owners allege the respondent body corporate has failed to maintain common property by failing to rectify building defects, and that the applicants have thereby suffered property damage and economic loss. The applicants seek orders that the body corporate repair the defects and remedy the applicants economic losses. The parties agree that the maintenance liability issue is so complicated that it is not suitable to be decided in this jurisdiction, and note that the dispute is also factually related to a proceeding already before a court. The parties note that an adjudicator lacks power to make the requested maintenance order to the extent the cost of repairs exceeds the monetary limit for an adjudicator’s order, and contend that an adjudicator also lacks power to make the requested order for economic loss. The questions for determination are: whether an adjudicator has power to order relief for economic loss; whether in any event it is appropriate to dismiss the application on the basis that the dispute should be dealt with in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, and if so; whether to make the order dismissing the application by consent. Act, s 276; 270(1)(b); 276(5), 281
Victoria Square [2021] QBCCMCmr 252
Other QBCCMCmr 26 May 2021
INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") ABC v Lenah Game Meats (2001) 208 CLR 199 Act, ss 276, 279. Accommodation Module, ss 102, 142
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.