Strata scheme CTS 38268
CTS 38268 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Sierra Grand [2026] QBCCMCmr 152
By-laws QBCCMCmr 18 May 2026
BY-LAWS – whether the respondent has breached and continues to breach the applicable noise by-law; whether the noise by-law is valid. Act, ss 94, 100(1) & (5), 168, 169, 180(1) & (7), 182-186; Accommodation Module, s 57
Sierra Grand [2024] QBCCMCmr 395
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 31 October 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY; REASONABLENESS – whether it was unreasonable for the body corporate to make an improvement to common property for the benefit of a single lot. Act, ss 94(1)(a), 94(2), 100(5), 280; Accommodation Module, ss 162, 176.
Sierra Grand [2023] QBCCMCmr 25
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 25 January 2023
REASONABLENESS – body corporate’s refusal to allow discounts for a contribution payment made after due date during the COVID-19 emergency – whether application concerns a debt dispute for which adjudicator is without jurisdiction – whether committee acted reasonably in denying lot owner’s request. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5), 229A, 270(1)(a), 276(1), 323E; Accommodation Module, ss 154, 156
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.