← Back to the full dossier
StrataAuditor Public-record dossier

Strata scheme CTS 38112

CTS 38112 Queensland

Verdict

Public record: 12 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

Cost exposure

Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Moderate
Good case $700 per lot
Expected $6,300 per lot
Worst case $24,900 per lot
  • Tribunal and legal costs

    Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 12 matters.

    $6,300

Litigation · 12 matters

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2023] QBCCMCmr 98

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 7 March 2023

    BY-LAWS – whether a by-law requiring compliance with design covenants is invalid because it is inconsistent with a local law or because it prohibits rather than regulates. COMMITTEE RESOLUTION – whether the body corporate committee acted unreasonably when deciding not to relax the design covenants to permit a fence to remain, where the fence was erected to comply with a local law concerning the keeping of animals. Act, ss 94(1)(b), 100(5), 169(1)(a)(i), 180(1)&(7).

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2022] QBCCMCmr 278

    Other QBCCMCmr 28 July 2022

    BODY CORPORATE PROPERTY – whether the respondents must comply with a request to return body corporate property – BODY CORPORATE MANAGER – whether the respondents are engaged as body corporate manager. Act, ss 14, 94, 100, 101, 119, 149B, 227, 229, 270 Standard Module, ss 71-73, 116, 133-142, 235

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2022] QBCCMCmr 182

    Other QBCCMCmr 13 May 2022

    INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2022] QBCCMCmr 65

    By-laws QBCCMCmr 22 February 2022

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from acting upon a by-law contravention notice until I can decide whether the by-law is invalid; whether a by-law requiring compliance with design guidelines is invalid because it prohibits rather than regulates or because it forces the applicant to breach a local government regulation; whether the committee acted unreasonably when deciding to issue the by-law contravention notice. Act, ss 100(5), 169, 180, 279(1).

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 535

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 25 November 2021

    REASONABLENESS – where subsidiary body corporate resolved to instruct representative to vote in support of principal body corporate undertaking maintenance on PBC land to stop flooding acting SBC lot – where SBC owner says the works would only benefit one owner and the flooding is due to the other owner not siting constructing their residence properly, and the works should be funded by that owner as an improvement to common property – whether unreasonable for SBC to vote in favour of PBC undertaking and paying for the works. Act, s 100(5)

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 267

    Other QBCCMCmr 1 June 2021

    INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. Act, s 279

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 262

    Other QBCCMCmr 31 May 2021

    APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the body corporate should be prevented from giving effect to a motion to re-appoint its body corporate manager pending final orders because owners were not presented with at least 2 quotations as a group of same-issue motions. Act, s 279(1); Standard Module, ss 81(1), 173.

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 253

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 26 May 2021

    RESOLUTION OF THE BODY CORPORATE – validity of resolution MAJOR SPENDING BY THE BODY CORPORATE – Requirement for approval by general meeting & for lot owners to be given at least 2 quotes section 173 Standard Module.

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 138

    Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 March 2021

    BODY CORPORATE FUNCTIONS – REASONABLENESS – INTERIM ORDER – where subsidiary body corporate committee voted to instruct its representative to vote in favour of the principal body corporate conducting drainage works on PBC common property – where owner in SBC alleges the works would benefit only one owner in the SBC and the work is not a PBC obligation – whether to grant interim order to stop SBC instructing representative to vote in favour of the works by the PBC Act, ss 94(1), 94(2), 100(5)

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2021] QBCCMCmr 17

    Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 14 January 2021

    GENERAL MEETING MOTIONS – whether 4 motions considered at a general meeting were valid. Act, ss 94, 270; Standard Module, ss 72, 80

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2020] QBCCMCmr 287

    Costs and procedure QBCCMCmr 29 May 2020

    COMMITTEE ELECTION – whether the elected chairperson was eligible to be a voting member of the committee – whether ballot papers with multiple votes for executive committee positions were valid – whether the election was valid – JURIDICTION – whether the orders sought are within the jurisdiction of an adjudicator - TIME LIMIT – whether the time limit for bringing the application should be waived. Act, ss 15, 227, 242, 309; Standard Module, ss 10, 21, 91

  • Riverstone Crossing - Riverstone [2020] QBCCMCmr 288

    Other QBCCMCmr 29 May 2020

    COMMITTEE ELECTION – whether the elected chairperson was eligible to be a voting member of the committee – whether ballot papers with multiple votes for executive committee positions were valid – whether the election was valid – TIME LIMIT – whether the time limit for bringing the application should be waived. Act, ss 15, 242, 309; Standard Module, ss 10, 21, 91

Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
CheckedFoundMatchLast checked
Registry and parcelLand registryStub onlyNot harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reportingNot yet checkedNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts12 mattersDirectNot harvested here yet
Levies and financialsNot yet checkedNot matchedNot in the public record
Defects and building-work ordersOutside current coverageNot matchedNot harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigatedNot on the public record, and no registry entry for this schemeNot matchedNever in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.

Compiled by StrataAuditor from Queensland titles register and the relevant licence registers. Litigation from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. Records only, as published; unknowns are shown as unknowns.

Coverage caveat: this reflects only what is on the public record for Queensland at the time of generation. An empty matters or orders count is not a clean bill: fund balances, current levies, minutes, and defects not yet litigated are never on the public record. Obtain the strata report before you bid.

Public-record summary, not legal or financial advice.

Generated 2 July 2026 · StrataAuditor

strataauditor.com/building/qld:CTS38112