Strata scheme CTS 30203
CTS 30203 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 8 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 8 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about by-laws
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
8 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 8 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 8 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?
Because we found a by-law matter on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 8 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 30203 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Calmwater Shores [2024] QBCCMCmr 401
Other QBCCMCmr 5 November 2024
INTERIM – whether an interim order is warranted. Act, s 279
- Calmwater Shores [2023] QBCCMCmr 377
By-laws QBCCMCmr 27 September 2023
BY-LAWS – where the applicants sought approval for alterations – where approval has not been given – whether the by-laws are valid – whether the plans should be approved – whether a committee member has a conflict of interest – whether an amount paid under the by-law should be reimbursed. Act, ss 94, 97, 100, 180, 270; Standard Module, ss 6(b), 58, 66, 86
- Calmwater Shores [2023] QBCCMCmr 115
By-laws QBCCMCmr 21 March 2023
BREACH OF BY-LAWS – where the scheme’s by-laws require any approved works to be completed within 12 months of commencement – where the respondents have not completed certain landscaping tasks and 12 months has elapsed since commencement of their build – whether the respondents are in breach of the scheme’s by-laws and deed of covenant Act, s 59; Standard Module, s 6
- Calmwater Shores [2022] QBCCMCmr 173
By-laws QBCCMCmr 9 May 2022
Whether the body corporate has acted to enforce its by-laws; whether the body corporate has enforced its by-laws in the way provided under the Act; whether the respondent contravened a by-law; whether the body corporate has acted reasonably enforcing its by-laws. Act, ss 94, 100, 182.
- Calmwater Shores [2022] QBCCMCmr 122
By-laws QBCCMCmr 30 March 2022
By-laws – whether breached; body corporate’s obligation to enforce reasonably. Act, ss 59, 66, 94, 182, 184.
- Calmwater Shores [2021] QBCCMCmr 499
By-laws QBCCMCmr 1 November 2021
BY-LAW CONTRAVENTION Act, ss 182 to 188
- Calmwater Shores [2021] QBCCMCmr 484
By-laws QBCCMCmr 21 October 2021
BY-LAW CONTRAVENTION Act, ss 182 to 188
- Calmwater Shores [2020] QBCCMCmr 109
By-laws QBCCMCmr 4 March 2020
BY-LAWS – whether the respondent breached by-laws by constructing a carport/patio/motorcycle garage – whether the structure was built in accordance with approved plans and by-laws – whether an order should be made for the respondent to remove the structure. Act, 94(1)(b), 100(5), 182, 2813, 269(3)(b), 269(3)(c).
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 8 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.