Strata scheme CTS 29467

CTS 29467 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 14 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

14 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
$6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

14 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $700 per lot

Expected $6,300 per lot

Worst case $24,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 14 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 14 matters.	$700	$6,300	$24,900
Total per lot	$700	$6,300	$24,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?

Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 14 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 29467 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

The Palladian [2026] QBCCMCmr 184
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 12 June 2026

IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – BY-LAWS – whether the installation of a shade structure on an exclusive use area of common property required body corporate consent – whether a general meeting decision on the proposal was invalid or unreasonable – whether consent should be deemed to have been given. BUGT Act, ss 30, 37A
The Palladian [2024] QBCCMCmr 442
Other QBCCMCmr 2 December 2024

RECORDS – whether the body corporate must allow the applicant to inspect the roll; whether the body corporate can redact information from the roll including proprietors’ address details; whether the body corporate must include proprietors’ email addresses on the roll BUGT Act, ss 39, 40
Royal Pines South Shields [2023] QBCCMCmr 465
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 27 November 2023

EGM PROCEDURES - Chairperson to have available for inspection a list of the names of the persons who are entitled to vote. COUNTING OF VOTES- entitlement to request a poll. COMMITTEE SPENDING – where spending involves payment of insurance premium. RATIFICATION - circumstances where spending can be subsequently ratified by a general meeting. Act, ss 47, 73, 77 Schedule 2, Part 2
Sutherland Apartments, Sky Villas and Villas [2023] QBCCMCmr 290
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 27 July 2023

GENERAL MEETING MOTION – where the body corporate resolved to raise a special levy to fund solicitors acting in legal proceedings – whether the motion was valid. BUGT Act, s 47, schedule 2, part 2, s 11(1)
Lakeview [2023] QBCCMCmr 173
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 3 May 2023

AGM RESOLUTIONS – whether several motions proposing expenditure on the engagement of various parties to perform work were invalid because they did not pass by special resoluton and did not offer members at least two tenders for the work. Act, ss 138, 151(1)(a), 158A, 163.
Sutherland Apartments, Sky Villas and Villas [2022] QBCCMCmr 392
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 28 October 2022

INTERIM ORDER – where the applicant disputes a general meeting resolution - whether an interim order should be made. BUGT Act, s 76
Sutherland Apartments, Sky Villas and Villas [2022] QBCCMCmr 385
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 20 October 2022

INTERIM ORDER – where the applicant disputes general meeting motions - whether an interim order should be made. BUGT Act, s 76
Couran Cove Eco Lodges [2022] QBCCMCmr 380
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 October 2022

CONDUCT OF GENERAL MEETINGS. REQUIREMENTS FOR A NOTICE OF A GENERAL MEETING. BUGT Act ss 73, 76, 77. Schedule 2, Part 2. DISCLOSURE Palm Springs Residences v J Patterson Holdings Pty Ltd [[2008] QDC 300](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QDC/2008/300.html "View Case") Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 RATIFICATION Warren v Body Corporate for Buon Vista [](http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCA/2007/160.html "View Case")[[2007] QCA 160](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCA/2007/160.html "View Case") Carroll and Ors v Palm Springs Residences CTS 29467 [](http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2013/21.html "View Case")[[2013] QCATA 21](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2013/21.html "View Case")
Couran Cove Eco Lodges [2022] QBCCMCmr 382
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 October 2022

CONDUCT OF GENERAL MEETINGS. REQUIREMENTS FOR A NOTICE OF A GENERAL MEETING. BUGT Act ss 73, 76, 77. Schedule 2, Part 2. DISCLOSURE Palm Springs Residences v J Patterson Holdings Pty Ltd [[2008] QDC 300](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QDC/2008/300.html "View Case") Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 RATIFICATION Warren v Body Corporate for Buon Vista [](http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCA/2007/160.html "View Case")[[2007] QCA 160](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCA/2007/160.html "View Case") Carroll and Ors v Palm Springs Residences CTS 29467 [](http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2013/21.html "View Case")[[2013] QCATA 21](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QCATA/2013/21.html "View Case")
Couran Cove Resort - Eco Lodges [2022] QBCCMCmr 293
Other QBCCMCmr 4 August 2022

REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") BUGT Act ss 73, 76, 77
Couran Cove Resort - Eco Lodges [2022] QBCCMCmr 170
Other QBCCMCmr 5 May 2022

REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") BUGT Act ss 73, 76, 77
Couran Cove Resort - Eco Lodges [2022] QBCCMCmr 171
Other QBCCMCmr 5 May 2022

REFEREE POWERS – whether Referee can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") BUGT Act ss 73, 76, 77
Bell Park [2022] QBCCMCmr 97
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 16 March 2022

Whether the body corporate properly served notice of a general meeting on each proprietor; whether a general meeting or a motion passed at at a general meeting should be set aside;. Act, ss 75, 77; Schedule 2 Part 2.
Azzura Greens [2021] QBCCMCmr 196
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 22 April 2021

EGM PROCEDURES – whether an extraordinary general meeting and its resolutions were void because proper notice of the meeting was not given, the meeting notice contained errors, proprietors were not given adequate background to the proposals on the agenda, or the agenda did not include motions submitted by proprietors. Act, s 121A, schedule 2; Acts Interpretation Act 1954, s 39(1).

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	14 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.