Strata scheme CTS 24592
CTS 24592 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 4 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.
Litigation · 4 matters
Admiralty Quays [2024] QBCCMCmr 83
By-laws QBCCMCmr 1 March 2024
BY-LAWS; IMPROVEMENT TO LOT – where an owner installed new hard flooring in her lot in 2018 that did not achieve the floor impact insulation prescribed by the by-laws at that time, and continues to fail the more relaxed standard in the present by-laws - whether the owner must alter the flooring to achieve the present standard. Act, ss 59(2)(b), 97.
Admiralty Quays [2023] QBCCMCmr 169
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 28 April 2023
CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE LOT ENTITLEMENTS WHETHER CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE LOT ENTITLEMENTS WERE ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT IN 2007
Admiralty Quays [2023] QBCCMCmr 170
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 28 April 2023
CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE LOT ENTITLEMENTS WHETHER CONTRIBUTION SCHEDULE LOT ENTITLEMENTS WERE ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT DISSENT IN 2007
Admiralty Quays [2022] QBCCMCmr 397
Other QBCCMCmr 7 November 2022
INTERIM ORDER – whether an interim order is necessary because of the nature or urgency of the circumstances to which the application relates. ADJUDICATOR’S POWERS – whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, s 279.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 4 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.