Strata scheme CTS 19482

CTS 19482 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

3 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about levies and contributions
$4,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, low band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

3 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.

Cost exposure

Low exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $600 per lot

Expected $4,300 per lot

Worst case $15,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 3 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.	$600	$4,300	$15,900
Total per lot	$600	$4,300	$15,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?

Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 3 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 19482 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Azzura Greens [2024] QBCCMCmr 228
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 19 June 2024

GENERAL MEETINGS – validity Act, s94C, Schedule 2, Part 2, s 4(a), Schedule 4, s 7
Gracemere Island Three [2024] QBCCMCmr 39
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 31 January 2024

MOTION – BODY CORPORATE MANAGER – where a motion to engage a body corporate manager did not provide two or more tenders – whether two or more tenders are required by the BUGT Act for a motion to engage a body corporate manager – where the schedule of fees and charges in the executed body corporate manager agreement was varied from the proposed agreement, but apparently in favour of the body corporate – whether to declare the resolution to adopt the agreement was invalid GENERAL MEETING – VOTING – where voting papers were invited and accepted by email – whether emailed votes may be valid under the legislation – whether an ordinary resolution is required to authorise voting by email GENERAL MEETING – QUORUM – where a general meeting proceeded allegedly without a quorum – whether to order that the motion decided at the meeting is void GENERAL MEETING – VOTING – CONFLICT OF INTEREST – where committee member who proposed a motion to engage a body corporate manager voted on the motion – whether there was a conflict of interest GENERAL MEETING – VOTING – CONFLICT OF INTEREST – where body corporate manager ran a general meeting and counted votes on a motion to engage them – whether there was a conflict of interest Act, ss 47(1), 50; Schedule 2, Part 2, ss 3 and 5
Couran Cove - Marine Apartments [2021] QBCCMCmr 402
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 25 August 2021

Levy by body corporate for contributions- "offset" of levies owing by the second and third respondents to first respondent by payment of debt owing by the body corporate to a third party Re York Street Mezzanine Pty. Ltd. (in liq) (2007) 162 FCR 458 Equuscorp Pty. Ltd. V Glengallan Investments P/L. [[2004] HCA 55](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/55.html "View Case"); (2004) 218 CLR 471 R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex parte Rossminster [[1979] UKHL 5](http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1979/5.html "View Case"); [[1980] AC 952](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b1980%5d%20AC%20952 "View LawCiteRecord") Magman International P/L v Westpac Banking [[1991] FCA 41](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/1991/636.html "View Case"); (1991) 32 FCR 1 BUGT Act ss 32, 37, 38, 38A, 38B 73, 76, 77, 78.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	3 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.