Strata scheme CTS 19297
CTS 19297 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $5,600
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.
Litigation · 5 matters
Summer Waters [2024] QBCCMCmr 264
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 18 July 2024
JURISDICTION – where an adjudicator does not have jurisdiction to determine a debt dispute under the Act, whether an application seeking the recovery of a debt is a debt dispute under the Act, and whether a defence raised by the respondents that the debt is not payable can be determined by an adjudicator REASONABLENESS – whether the body corporate acted unreasonably by not providing the respondents with a further opportunity to repair the ruptured pipe themselves; by not notifying the respondents that it would be proceeding with the repair works; and by purportedly failing to communicate effectively with the respondents – whether the repair costs are unreasonable MAINTENANCE – UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE – whether the respondents can avoid responsibility to maintain a pipe that solely services their lot and is within their lot on the basis that they did not cause damage to the pipe and that they did not originally install the pipe Act, ss 20, 94, 100, 160, 161 and 229A; Standard Module, ss 180, 211 and 212
Summer Waters [2022] QBCCMCmr 283
By-laws QBCCMCmr 1 August 2022
BY-LAW – whether a by-law purporting to require approval for work on a lot is valid – COMMITTEE DECISION – whether the committee failed to act reasonably in not approving components of a patio on a lot. Act, ss 94, 100, 169
Summer Waters [2021] QBCCMCmr 496
Other QBCCMCmr 28 October 2021
INTERIM ORDER – whether interim orders are warranted. Act, s 279
Summer Waters [2021] QBCCMCmr 207
By-laws QBCCMCmr 30 April 2021
BY-LAWS – where the respondent installed a patio on his lot – whether the patio complied with the conditions of approval – whether the respondent has breached the by-laws -whether the respondent should be required to remove the patio. Act, ss 94, 182-188
Summer Waters [2020] QBCCMCmr 130
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 13 March 2020
INTERIM ORDER – where lot owner allegedly installed gate on common property fence without approval – whether to make interim order to stop use of gate pending final determination. Act, s 184; 186
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.