Strata scheme CTS 17940

CTS 17940 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

5 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
$13,600 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

5 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Water-ingress dispute on record

At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $2,700 per lot

Expected $13,600 per lot

Worst case $46,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Waterproofing and common-property repair A water or waterproofing dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.	$2,000	$8,000	$25,000
Tribunal and legal costs 5 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters.	$700	$5,600	$21,900
Total per lot	$2,700	$13,600	$46,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?

Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.
2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 5 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan CTS 17940 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Jefferson Villas [2024] QBCCMCmr 473
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 17 December 2024

MAINTENANCE – where roofing membrane is on common property allocated under an exclusive use by-law – extent of body corporate’s responsibility for maintenance – liability for damage resulting from failure to maintain roofing membrane RES JUDICATA– where same matter has previously been litigated. Act, s281; Standard Module, ss 180, 187, 192(2) & 192(3)
Jefferson Villas [2024] QBCCMCmr 237
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 24 June 2024

INTERIM ORDER – Application for interim order– whether warranted in circumstances\_.\_ SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act ss 238, 247, 276, 279 MAINTENANCE – where roofing membrane is on common property allocated under an exclusive use by-law – extent of body corporate’s responsible for maintenance where an improvement is made to common property for a lot owner. Act, s281; Standard Module, ss 180, 192(2) & 192(3)
Jefferson Villas [2023] QBCCMCmr 281
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 25 July 2023

MAINTENANCE – where roofing membrane is on common property allocated under an exclusive use by-law – whether body corporate is responsible for maintenance; whether body corporate has failed to maintain membrane in good condition; whether body corporate is responsible for repairing water damage to owner’s lot; whether body corporate is required to reimburse owner for cost of expert reports. Act, s281; Standard Module, s192(2) \&s192(3)
Jefferson Villas [2022] QBCCMCmr 103
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 21 March 2022

BODY CORPORATE PROPERTY – whether the respondent must comply with a request to return body corporate property – BODY CORPORATE MANAGER – whether the respondent is engaged as body corporate manager has ended – whether the respondent must cease purporting to act for the body corporate – GENERAL MEETING PROCEDURE – whether general meetings purportedly called by the respondent are valid – COSTS – whether the respondent should pay the application fees. Act, ss 97, 100, 119, 229, 270, 280, 318; Standard Module, ss 40-2, 82(1), 93(1), 133-142, 235
Jefferson Villas [2022] QBCCMCmr 61
Other QBCCMCmr 18 February 2022

APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER – whether there is a question of law for determination and whether the balance of convenience falls in favour of the applicant –whether to make an order pending a decision on the application for final orders. Act, ss 100(5), 169, 269(3), 276(1), 279(1).

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	5 matters	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.