Strata scheme CTS 14978
CTS 14978 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 7 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $6,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters.
Litigation · 7 matters
Paradise Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 392
Other QBCCMCmr 28 October 2024
REASONABLENESS – whether the committee’s decision to reject a request to display commercial signage on a lot was unreasonable. Act, ss 94(2), 100(5)
Paradise Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 192
Other QBCCMCmr 23 May 2024
ASSOCIATE – whether a candidate for election was an associate of a service contractor or letting agent; whether the body corporate elected an ineligible person to be a voting member of the committee. ONUS OF PROOF – STANDARD OF PROOF – EVIDENCE whether evidence sufficient to satisfy adjudicator Act, ss 99, 309; Standard Module, s 10.
Paradise Towers [2024] QBCCMCmr 96
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 12 March 2024
BY-LAWS – where a by-law requires body corporate approval to display signs on the visible parts of a lot – where the respondent has two signs in his lot that are visible from the common property - whether the signs have been approved by the body corporate or the body corporate has acquiesced to them – whether the signs must be removed.
Paradise Towers [2022] QBCCMCmr 399
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 8 November 2022
REQUESTED EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING – where more than 25% of lots’ owners served notice on the committee to request an EGM be called – where the secretary disputed the validity of some signatures on the notice and therefore decided there were not at least 25% of owners as signatories – where the secretary did not call the requested EGM – where the caretaking service contractor as a non-voting committee member called the EGM because the secretary failed to call the EGM – whether the secretary’s decision that the notice was invalid thereby rendered it a nullity – whether a non-voting committee member is a committee member who may call a requested EGM which the secretary has failed to call – where the notice also requested the non-voting member to call the EGM in the event the secretary did not call it – whether the signatories’ written request for another committee member to call the EGM must come after and separately from the notice served on the secretary. REASONABLENESS – where the body corporate passed a motion to reserve as a restricted issue for the committee any decision concerning a remedial action notice – whether the decision was unreasonable ASSOCIATE – where caretaker is mortgagor for property owned by committee member’s spouse – whether a mortgagor / mortgagee relationship is the type of association which renders a person ineligible to be a committee member Act, ss 94, 309; Standard Module, ss 84, 85
Paradise Towers [2022] QBCCMCmr 306
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 17 August 2022
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ORDERS – whether the caretaking service contractor should be prevented, without body corporate consent, from changing the locks to an area of common property over which it has a non-exclusive occupation authority. Act, ss 94(1)(a), 95(1), 149B(1)(a), 229(2), 279(1), 318; Standard Module, s 157.
Paradise Towers [2022] QBCCMCmr 270
Management and meetings QBCCMCmr 18 July 2022
REQUESTED EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING – where owners served notice on the committee to requested the committee to call an EGM – where the secretary disputed the validity of the requested EGM notice and did not call the requested EGM – where the caretaking service contractor as a non-voting committee member called the EGM because the secretary failed to call the EGM – whether the secretary’s decision that the notice was invalid thereby rendered it a nullity – whether a non-voting committee member is a committee member who may call a requested EGM which the secretary has failed to call – whether to make interim orders to stop the EGM or the implementation of any resolutions Act, s 279; Standard Module, ss 9, 12, 82, 84, 85
Paradise Towers [2021] QBCCMCmr 294
Other QBCCMCmr 16 June 2021
VALIDITY OF REQUESTED EGM – whether an EGM requested by owners was valid where a committee member other than the secretary called the meeting at the request of only 1 of the owners who signed the original request for an EGM, owners were given less than 21 days’ notice of the EGM, no physical meeting was held, all votes were cast by secret ballot paper, and lot owners’ details were printed on the secret ballot paper in some instances. Standard Module, ss 84, 85, 91, 92, 104, 108; Acts Interpretation Act 1954, ss 38(1)(a), 39A(1)(b).
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.