Strata scheme CTS 14927
CTS 14927 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 3 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Elevated- $25,000
Serious building-defect rectification
Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $4,300
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters.
Litigation · 3 matters
Florence Court [2024] QBCCMCmr 276
Building defects QBCCMCmr 30 July 2024
MAINTENANCE IN A BUILDING FORMAT PLAN Responsibility for maintenance of balustrades and waterproofing membranes. Maintenance obligations of bodies corporate / Maintenance obligations of lot owners Act, ss 94(1), 100(5), 279 Standard Module, s 180, s 211. National Construction Code, Volume 2
Florence Court [2024] QBCCMCmr 251
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 3 July 2024
MAINTENANCE; EASEMENT – where the body corporate had a common property water pipe within a lot replaced and the plumber installed the new pipe in a different location; where the body corporate’s expenditure on the work was not properly authorised and the new pipe would obstruct cabinets the applicant hoped to install in his lot; where the applicant claims the committee exceeds its spending limit, fails to keep proper records or provide access to them, and excludes him from correspondence; whether the new water pipe must be returned to the location of the old pipe and the body corporate must audit its statement of accounts. Act, ss 20, 62, 68(1), 70(1)(b) & (2)(b), 94(2), 100(5), 101B(3), 108, 186; Standard Module, ss 45, 172, 176(1), 180(1), 187; Land Title Act 1994, s 115O.
Florence Court [2024] QBCCMCmr 30
Other QBCCMCmr 25 January 2024
INTERIM ORDERS – whether interim orders are warranted in the circumstances. ADJUDICATOR POWERS – whether Adjudicator can be satisfied that an application raises a serious legal question and the balance of convenience between the parties justifies injunctive relief. SDW2 Pty Ltd v JLF Corporation Pty Ltd [[2017] QSC 001](/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=%5b2017%5d%20QSC%20001 "View LawCiteRecord") Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [[2006] HCA 46](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2006/46.html "View Case") Act, ss 94(1), 100(5), 279 Standard Module, s 180.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.