Strata scheme CTS 14898
CTS 14898 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Ocean Sound [2026] QBCCMCmr 172
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 3 June 2026
TIME LIMIT – whether for good reason adjudicator should waive non-compliance with statutory time limits for making application; BUDGETS – where body corporate decided at a general meeting to adopt a sinking fund budget of $2,500 for its 2025 financial year whether the body corporate complied with its statutory obligations and failed to act reasonably in making financial management decisions; CONTRIBUTIONS – whether adjudicator is satisfied contributions levied on owners are unreasonable and that an order should be made increasing the contribution to a reasonable amount. Act, ss 94(2), 242, 276(3) and Schedule 5, Item 11; Standard Module, ss 160, 162 and 163
Ocean Sound [2026] QBCCMCmr 165
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 29 May 2026
TIME LIMIT – whether for good reason adjudicator should waive non-compliance with statutory time limits for making application; BUDGETS – where body corporate decided at a general meeting to adopt a sinking fund budget of $2,500 for its 2025 financial year whether the body corporate complied with its statutory obligations and failed to act reasonably in making financial management decisions; CONTRIBUTIONS – whether adjudicator is satisfied contributions levied on owners are unreasonable and that an order should be made increasing the contribution to a reasonable amount. Act, ss 94(2), 242, 276(3) and Schedule 5, Item 11; Standard Module, ss 160, 162 and 163
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.