Strata scheme CTS 11952
CTS 11952 Queensland
Verdict
Public record: 2 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Moderate- $8,000
Waterproofing and common-property repair
Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.
- $3,700
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.
Litigation · 2 matters
Kapalua Sun Court [2024] QBCCMCmr 363
Other QBCCMCmr 3 October 2024
ACCESS TO A LOT – where the body corporate has issued a notice of entry seeking access to the respondents’ lot and where the respondents have refused access – whether orders are warranted. Act, s 163; Standard Module, s 180
Kapalua Sun Court [2024] QBCCMCmr 122
Levies and contributions QBCCMCmr 26 March 2024
MAINTENANCE; REIMBURSEMENT – A common property drain beneath the applicant’s ensuite leaked and damaged the ceiling of the lot below. The applicant paid to repair the drain and the body corporate paid to repair the ceiling. The body corporate added the cost of repairing the ceiling to the applicant’s levies account, where it caused him to lose on-time payment discounts and incur penalty interest and recovery costs until he paid it. Whether the body corporate must reimburse the applicant for the drain and ceiling repairs, the lost discounts, the penalty interest, and recovery costs. Act, ss 20, 252E(5), 281; Standard Module, ss 102(2), 163-166, 180(1), 187.
Decisions naming this scheme, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 2 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.