Strata scheme CTS 11034
CTS 11034 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Queensland checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 5 tribunal matters. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
- 5 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
- $30,600 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.
-
5 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter. | $8,000 | $25,000 | $80,000 |
Tribunal and legal costs 5 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 5 matters. | $700 | $5,600 | $21,900 |
| Total per lot | $8,700 | $30,600 | $101,900 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?
Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
- 2
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?
Because we found a by-law matter on record.
- 3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 5 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan CTS 11034 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Camden [2026] QBCCMCmr 143
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 12 May 2026
OBLIGATION OF BODY CORPORATE TO MAINTAIN COMMON PROPERTY AND ROOFING STRUCTURES FAILURE TO MAINTAIN COMMON PROPERTY - LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE TO LOTS MAINTENANCE / IMPROVEMENTS – whether repair works to common property constitute “improvements” or “maintenance”. Sections 152, 159, 281 Body Corporate and Community Management Act Sections 180 186 Standard Module Regulation Seiwa v Strata Plan 35042 [2006] NSWSC The Moroccan [[2006] QBCCMCmr 729](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QBCCMCmr/2006/729.html "View Case") MAGOG (NO 15) P/ L v Body Corporate for the Moroccan [[2010] QDC 70](/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/qld/QDC/2010/70.html "View Case")
- Camden [2026] QBCCMCmr 78
Other QBCCMCmr 13 March 2026
INTERIM ORDERS – whether interim orders are warranted in the circumstances. Act, s 100(5); Standard Module, s 174
- Camden [2024] QBCCMCmr 380
Building defects QBCCMCmr 21 October 2024
IMPROVEMENTS TO LOT – where the respondents have removed internal kitchen walls from their lot BY-LAWS -Where a by-law requires body corporate approval for structural alterations, and the body corporate approval not obtained EASEMENTS OF SUPPORT RES JUDICATA– whether same matter has been finally decided Act, s 163, s 279(1). Standard Module, s 180(2)(b) Land Title Act 1994 s115N
- Camden [2024] QBCCMCmr 298
Repairs and common property QBCCMCmr 16 August 2024
IMPROVEMENT TO COMMON PROPERTY – where an owner sought body corporate approval to install air-conditioning units on common property – where the motion was defeated – whether the body corporate acted reasonably – whether opposition to a motion proposing exclusive use of the area was unreasonable in the circumstances. Act, s 94(2); Standard Module, s187
- Camden [2023] QBCCMCmr 168
Building defects QBCCMCmr 24 April 2023
IMPROVEMENT TO LOT – where the respondents wish to remove two internal kitchen walls from their lot, a by-law requires body corporate approval for structural alterations, and the body corporate has not approved the alteration; whether the respondents should be prevented from removing the walls until a determination is made as to whether body corporate approval is required because the walls are loadbearing. Act, s 279(1).
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from QBCCMCmr via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 5 matters | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.