7 Australia Avenue Sydney Olympic Park

SP 90189 · Registered 8 December 2014 · 353 lots · City Of Parramatta · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026

Prepare for client / Print Strata in Sydney Olympic Park →

Public record: 2 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

2 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about building defects
Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd is named at 3 schemes, a cross-scheme pattern
$32,800 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

2 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Building-defect dispute on record

A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.

Statutory warranty: structural cover likely expired (est. 8 December 2020); non-structural ran to 8 December 2016. NSW Home Building Act periods: 6 years for major or structural defects, 2 years for all others. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.
Builder named across multiple schemes

Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd is named in litigation at 3 strata schemes, a cross-scheme pattern worth checking before you buy.
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub

We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.

Cost exposure

Elevated exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $9,000 per lot

Expected $32,800 per lot

Worst case $110,700 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Serious building-defect rectification A decision on this scheme was classified as a building-defect matter. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 2 matters.	$8,500	$29,100	$97,700
Tribunal and legal costs 2 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 2 matters.	$500	$3,700	$13,000
Total per lot	$9,000	$32,800	$110,700

Across all 353 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $11,578,400 building-wide, before any government contribution.

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?

Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
2
The building's builder is named in disputes at other schemes, is the original builder still solvent for a warranty claim?

Because Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd appears at 3 schemes.
3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 2 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan SP 90189 was registered on 8 December 2014 in the City Of Parramatta council area and comprises 353 lots.

It is located at 7 Australia Avenue Sydney Olympic Park.

Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.

nothing found matters order

View on the full map →

Litigation

The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1477
Costs and procedure NSWSC 28 October 2022

COSTS – indemnity costs – defendant makes unsuccessful application for advanced ruling on evidence pursuant to section 192A, Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – plaintiff makes “walk away” offer – application more strange than novel – defendant asks the Court to depart from good law – rejection of offer unreasonable.
The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1382
Building defects NSWSC 14 October 2022

EVIDENCE – application for advance ruling – section 192A, Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – builder seeks ruling that expert reports are inadmissible as irrelevant – case law review and principles regarding advance rulings at [40]-[50] – premature to make rulings sought where builder yet to serve evidence and trial date not allocated. CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings in Technology and Construction List – plaintiff’s pleadings initially defective – parties agree to provision of further particulars of defects

Companies named in these matters

Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd, named in litigation at 3 strata schemes

Builders, developers, and contractors named opposite this scheme. A company appearing across many schemes is a pattern worth a closer look before you buy.

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Decisions, in detail

Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.

The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1477
Building defects · Applicant successful Rees J

The defendant's motion for an advance ruling under section 192A of the Evidence Act seeking to exclude expert reports was dismissed, and the plaintiff was awarded indemnity costs from the date of the Calderbank letter because the defendant's rejection of the walk away offer was unreasonable given the motion's lack of merit and the plaintiff's prior warnings.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 (owners corp)
- Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd (builder)
The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1382
Building defects · Respondent successful Rees J

The Court dismissed the builder's motion seeking an advance ruling that expert reports were inadmissible, finding it premature and inappropriate to use section 192A of the Evidence Act where the parties had agreed to a Scott Schedule procedure and no trial date had been allocated.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 90189 (owners corp)
- Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd (builder)
- Sydney Olympic Park Authority (developer)

Compared to Sydney Olympic Park

In Sydney Olympic Park, 27% of 11 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 2 matters are in line with the local average of 2.3 per litigated scheme.

The Sydney Olympic Park dispute landscape →

Evidence ledger

Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	NSW Strata Hub, with geometry	Direct	Awaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	2 matters	Direct	28 June 2026
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Checked, none found	Direct	28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.