100 Glover Street Mosman
SP 85385 · Registered 2 August 2013 · 29 lots · Mosman · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 3 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 3 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
- $39,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
3 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Statutory warranty: structural cover likely expired (est. 2 August 2019); non-structural ran to 2 August 2015. NSW Home Building Act periods: 6 years for major or structural defects, 2 years for all others. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A decision on this scheme was classified as a building-defect matter. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 3 matters. | $9,100 | $35,000 | $123,200 |
Tribunal and legal costs 3 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters. | $600 | $4,300 | $15,900 |
| Total per lot | $9,700 | $39,300 | $139,100 |
Across all 29 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $1,139,700 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?
Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 3 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 85385 was registered on 2 August 2013 in the Mosman council area and comprises 29 lots.
It is located at 100 Glover Street Mosman.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- The Owners – Strata Plan no 85385 v Barnett (No 2) [2026] NSWCATAP 175
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 4 June 2026
COSTS- whether costs of the appeal should be paid by the Appellant- consideration of special circumstances- Appellant unsuccessful except as to the costs order made at first instance-whether an allowance should be made in respect of a costs order to reflect the Appellants success on the issue of costs at first instance.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 v Barnett [2026] NSWCATAP 51
Repairs and common property NSWCATAP 19 February 2026
APPEAL- whether timber decking on balconies and terraces is lot property or common property- consideration of provisions defining lot property and common property in the Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 NSW and regulations- whether a bylaw is void for uncertainty.
- Barnett v The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385; The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 v Barnett [2025] NSWCATCD 81
Repairs and common property NSWCATCD 7 July 2025
LAND LAW – Strata schemes – Common property – whether common property or lot property LAND LAW – Strata schemes – By-laws – power to make declarations that by-law void, repealed or varied – standing of owners corporation to seek order declaring by-law invalid – validity of by-law purporting to qualify duties under s 106 LAND LAW – Strata title – Owners corporation – power of owners corporation to enter into settlement agreement – authority of strata managing agent to enter into settlement agreem
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Decisions, in detail
Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.
- The Owners – Strata Plan no 85385 v Barnett (No 2) [2026] NSWCATAP 175 Repairs and common property · Mixed S Westgarth, Deputy President; R Titterton OAM, Senior Member
The Appellant's appeal was dismissed on substantive grounds but partially succeeded on a costs procedural issue; the Respondents were ordered to be the successful parties overall, and the Appellant was ordered to pay 90% of the Respondents' appeal costs to reflect the mixed outcome.
- The Owners – Strata Plan no 85385 (owners corp)
- Annette Barnett (lot owner)
- Laura Lillas (lot owner)
- Tony Clarkson (lot owner)
- Kandiah Theivendren (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 v Barnett [2026] NSWCATAP 51 Repairs and common property · Respondent successful S Westgarth, Deputy President; R Titterton OAM, Senior Member
The appeal was dismissed; the timber decking on balconies and terraces was determined to be common property for which the owners corporation is responsible for maintenance and repair, and the costs order at first instance was set aside and remitted for reconsideration.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 (owners corp)
- Annette Barnett (lot owner)
- Laura Lillas (lot owner)
- Tony Clarkson (lot owner)
- Kandiah Theivendren (lot owner)
- Barnett v The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385; The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 v Barnett [2025] NSWCATCD 81 Repairs and common property · Applicant successful Senior Member N Kulkarni
The tribunal found that timber decks on balconies and terraces are common property, ordered the owners corporation to carry out replacement work within six months, declared special by-law 11 invalid, and ordered the owners corporation to pay the lot owners' costs.
- Annette Barnett (lot owner)
- Laura Lillas (lot owner)
- Tony Clarkson (lot owner)
- Kandiah Theivendren (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 85385 (owners corp)
Compared to Mosman
In Mosman, 1% of 816 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 3 matters are well above the local average of 1.6 per litigated scheme.
The Mosman dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.