77 Tamarind Avenue Bogangar
SP 76700 · Registered 16 March 2006 · 44 lots · Tweed · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 7 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 7 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about levies and contributions
- $39,000 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
7 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Building-defect dispute on record
A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.
Statutory warranty: structural cover likely expired (est. 16 March 2013); non-structural ran to 16 March 2013. A single 7-year warranty period applies because the scheme was registered before the 1 February 2012 reform. Estimated from the registration date, not the completion date or building contract, so treat the dates as indicative.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Elevated exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious building-defect rectification A decision on this scheme was classified as a building-defect matter. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 2 matters. | $8,900 | $32,700 | $113,100 |
Tribunal and legal costs 7 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 7 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $9,600 | $39,000 | $138,000 |
Across all 44 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $1,716,000 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What building defects have been identified, is there a funded rectification plan, and does the builder's warranty still apply?
Because we found a building-defect dispute on record.
- 2
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?
Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
- 3
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 4
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 5
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 7 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 76700 was registered on 16 March 2006 in the Tweed council area and comprises 44 lots.
It is located at 77 Tamarind Avenue Bogangar.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCA 242
Management and meetings NSWCA 13 October 2021
ESTOPPEL – proprietary estoppel – encouragement – nature of promise – strata title – promise of easement – whether representation sufficiently clear – where representation made at general meeting – where representation did not define the interest in property the representee was expected to receive – where further documentation was required to be executed to give effect to the representation ESTOPPEL – proprietary estoppel – encouragement – detrimental reliance – strata title – promise of easemen
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 v Trentelman (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 268
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 10 September 2021
COSTS - no question of principle
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCATAP 222
Levies and contributions NSWCATAP 21 July 2021
APPEAL – strata scheme – reallocation of unit entitlements – application to vary past contributions in line with new allocation of unit entitlements – application of s 87 of Act – denial of procedural fairness – exercise of discretion – while error of law found no error in exercise of discretion
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 v Trentelman [2021] NSWCATAP 205
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 9 July 2021
APPEALS — procedure — time limits — extension of time — principles — delay of two years — no question of principle
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 76700 [2021] NSWCATCD 73
Management and meetings NSWCATCD 11 June 2021
LAND LAW — Strata title — Strata managing agent — Auditor
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCA 62
Costs and procedure NSWCA 19 April 2021
PRACTICE - stay of execution pending appeal - appropriateness of interlocutory relief - appeal concedely reasonably arguable - whether appellant had established significantly greater prospect of success - balance of convenience - application for stay pending appeal refused
- Trentelman v The Owners - Strata Plan 76700; The Owners - Strata Plan 76700 v Trentelman [2021] NSWSC 155
Management and meetings NSWSC 26 February 2021
CONTRACT – formation and validity – proposal by owner of development lots to convert lots into non-strata blocks and build townhouses of specified height – cooperation of strata corporation required – development lot owner promised proposal would result in continuing access for strata owners to swimming pool on her land – resolution passed at general meeting – no contractual effect ESTOPPEL – proprietary estoppel – encouragement – detrimental reliance – whether lot owner’s promise made to strata
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Decisions, in detail
Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCA 242 Repairs and common property · Respondent successful Bathurst CJ, Bell P, Leeming JA
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the primary judge's finding that the Owners Corporation established proprietary estoppel warranting an easement for use of the swimming pool on lot 53.
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 (owners corp)
- Registrar General of New South Wales (government)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 v Trentelman (No 2) [2021] NSWCATAP 268 Costs and procedure · Respondent successful G Curtin SC, Senior Member J McAteer
The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the unsuccessful application to extend time to appeal, with such costs to be paid from contributions levied on lots other than the respondent's lot.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 (owners corp)
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCATAP 222 Levies and funds · Respondent successful K Ransome, Senior Member; J Kearney, Senior Member
The appeal was dismissed; the Tribunal's decision to refuse to vary levies struck between 2015 and 2018 to reflect a subsequent reallocation of unit entitlements was upheld, as the Tribunal's exercise of discretion did not miscarry.
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 (owners corp)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 v Trentelman [2021] NSWCATAP 205 Levies and funds · Respondent successful G Curtin SC, Senior Member J McAteer
Application to extend time to appeal the Tribunal's costs decision was dismissed due to extraordinary delay of over two years with no adequate explanation, despite the appeal having good prospects of success.
- The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 (owners corp)
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 76700 [2021] NSWCATCD 73
Strata Plus Pty Ltd appointed as managing agent to arrange payment of judgment debt of $87,786.50 within 3 months and to engage an auditor to conduct a comprehensive audit of the owners corporation's finances within 28 days.
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No. 76700 (owners corp)
- Strata Plus Pty Ltd (manager)
- Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700 [2021] NSWCA 62 Repairs and common property · Respondent successful Leeming JA
The application by Ms Trentelman for a further stay of execution of the injunction and declaratory orders was dismissed, with the effect that orders requiring her to allow the owners corporation and authorised persons access to the swimming pool on Lot 53 came into effect from 21 April 2021 pending determination of her appeal.
- Natalia Trentelman (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No. 76700 (owners corp)
Compared to Bogangar
In Bogangar, 1% of 162 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 7 matters are well above the local average of 4 per litigated scheme.
The Bogangar dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 7 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.