Strata scheme SP 72939
SP 72939 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · New South Wales checked 30 June 2026
Public record: 3 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 3 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about repairs and common property
- $14,100 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
3 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
Water-ingress dispute on record
At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Waterproofing and common-property repair A decision on this scheme was classified as a water-ingress matter. Indicative per-lot waterproofing and common-property repair levies (strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 2 matters. | $2,200 | $9,800 | $32,400 |
Tribunal and legal costs 3 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 3 matters. | $600 | $4,300 | $15,900 |
| Total per lot | $2,800 | $14,100 | $48,300 |
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?
Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 3 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 72939 is on the register.
Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.
Litigation
- Noor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 (No 3) [2023] NSWCATAP 275
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 13 October 2023
COSTS — Party/Party — Appeals – amount in dispute exceeds $30,000 - general rule that costs follow the event - issues severable – respondent successful on one issue – whether order for costs should reflect respondent’s partial success and unreasonable conduct of the appellant
- Noor v The Owners-Strata Plan No 72939 (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 270
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 10 October 2023
APPEALS – from decision as to costs only – substantive decision already set aside and remitted in part
- Noor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 [2023] NSWCATAP 236
Repairs and common property NSWCATAP 24 August 2023
APPEALS — Appeal on question of law – Scope of question of law APPEALS — Leave to appeal — Principles governing LAND LAW — Strata title — Owners corporation - maintenance and repair of common property - breach of obligation to maintain and repair common property – where lot affected by water leakage –action for work order and recovery of loss by lot owner from owners corporation pursuant to s 106(5) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) – whether action was time barred by s 106(6) of t
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Decisions, in detail
Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.
- Noor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 (No 3) [2023] NSWCATAP 275 Costs and procedure · Mixed G Blake AM SC, Senior Member J S Currie
Both the owners corporation's application to vary the costs order and the owner's application to vary the costs order were dismissed; the Appeal Panel maintained its original no order as to costs of the appeal decision.
- Haidi Noor (lot owner)
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 (owners corp)
- Noor v The Owners-Strata Plan No 72939 (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 270 Water ingress · Applicant successful A Suthers, Principal Member; G Sarginson, Senior Member
The appeal was allowed; the Tribunal's costs decision was set aside and remitted for redetermination once the primary proceedings have been redetermined.
- Hadi Noor (lot owner)
- The Owners-Strata Plan No 72939 (owners corp)
- Noor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 [2023] NSWCATAP 236 Water ingress · Mixed G Blake AM SC, Senior Member J S Currie
The appeal was allowed; the order dismissing the claim for damages for loss of rent was upheld as time-barred, but the issues of whether the lot owner is entitled to a work order and damages other than for loss of rent were remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration.
- Haidi Noor (lot owner)
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 72939 (owners corp)
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub | Stub only | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 3 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.