84-86 Wolseley Road Point Piper
SP 62022 · Registered 5 April 2000 · 2 lots · Woollahra · New South Wales checked 10 June 2026
Public record: 11 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.
- 11 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about unit entitlements
- $6,300 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band
The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
Public record checked
Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
- Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
- Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
-
Decide
Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.
Risk read
What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.
-
11 litigation matters on record
Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
-
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub
We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.
Cost exposure
Moderate exposureAn indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.
| Driver | Good | Expected | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
Tribunal and legal costs 11 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 11 matters. | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
| Total per lot | $700 | $6,300 | $24,900 |
Across all 2 lots, an expected program of this kind is on the order of $12,600 building-wide, before any government contribution.
Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.
Questions to ask before you bid
- 1
What was the levy or contributions dispute about, and are any unfunded works coming?
Because we found a levy/contributions matter on record.
- 2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
- 3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
- 4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?
Ask about this building
Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.
Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 11 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.
Building record
Strata plan SP 62022 was registered on 5 April 2000 in the Woollahra council area and comprises 2 lots.
It is located at 84-86 Wolseley Road Point Piper.
Parcel geometry for the scheme is held on file.
Litigation
- Bischoff v Sahade & Owners Corporation SP 62022 [2015] NSWCATAP 196
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 16 September 2015
Costs – special circumstances
- Sahade v Owners Corporation SP 62022 [2015] NSWCATAP 146
Unit entitlements NSWCATAP 21 July 2015
Strata Schemes Management Act- reallocation of unit entitlements, exercise of discretion
- Rita Sahade v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 62022 & Carina Gilster & Eckart Bischoff [2015] NSWCATCD 46
Levies and contributions NSWCATCD 2 April 2015
STRATA SCHEME - appeal against adjudicator’s orders - excessive levies - legal costs of owners corporation
- Rita Sahade v The Owners – Strata Plan No 62022 and Ors [2015] NSWCATCD 5
Unit entitlements NSWCATCD 13 January 2015
Unit reallocation - management and control – power to reallocate unit entitlements if original allocation considered unreasonable – respective value of lots
- Sahade v The Owners - Strata Plan 62022 [2014] NSWCA 208
Unit entitlements NSWCA 1 July 2014
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - error of law - tribunal declined to reallocate unit entitlements in strata scheme - appeal to District Court - remittal to tribunal ordered on the basis that there was a failure to give reasons - whether an error of law disclosed in requiring the issue of control of strata scheme management to be considered on remittal REAL PROPERTY - strata titles - management and control - allocation of unit entitlements - power to reallocate units entitlements if origina
- Rita Sahade v The Owners Strata Plan No 62022 [2014] NSWCATCD 48
Other NSWCATCD 10 April 2014
Not functioning satisfactorily
- The Owners - Strata Plan No 62022 v Sahade [2013] NSWSC 2002
Costs and procedure NSWSC 30 December 2013
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION - Strata Schemes Management Act 2007 - validity of meeting - failure to give notice to lot owner - insufficient notice - strict compliance necessary - appeal dismissed
- Rita Sahade v Owners Corporation SP 62022 [2013] NSWSC 1791
Other NSWSC 3 December 2013
TORRENS SYSTEM - General matters - Application to Registrar-General to correct error in register - Review of Registrar-General's decision - Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 12(1)(d), 122 WORDS AND PHRASES - "errors" - "in relation to"
- Rita Sahade v Owners Corporation SP62022 & Ors [2013] NSWDC 95
Unit entitlements NSWDC 14 June 2013
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review -error of law- appeal from Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal refusing to vary allocation of unit entitlements in strata scheme - whether tribunal wrongly substituted its own expert opinion or property values - alleged failure to give reasons - alleged apprehend bias - statutory construction of s 183(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 -Tribunal failed to take into account the 'control issue'
- Sahade v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 62022 & Ors [2006] NSWLEC 770
Costs and procedure NSWLEC 27 November 2006
Costs :- whether respondents satisfied applicants' claim or whether matter resolved by suupervening event - no order as to costs
Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Compared to Point Piper
In Point Piper, 6% of 65 strata schemes carry a tribunal matter on the public record. This scheme's 11 matters are well above the local average of 5 per litigated scheme.
The Point Piper dispute landscape →Evidence ledger
Registry-backed record: matched to a scheme on the register by its plan number.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | NSW Strata Hub, with geometry | Direct | Awaiting first run |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 11 matters | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Checked, none found | Direct | 28 June 2026 |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.
Deep report · coming soon
On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.