Strata scheme SP 55773

SP 55773 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · New South Wales checked 30 June 2026

Public record: 4 tribunal matters, no building-work orders. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a section 184 strata search, before you bid.

4 tribunal or court matters, the most serious about by-laws
$5,000 indicative cost exposure per lot, moderate band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a section 184 strata search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a section 184 strata search before you bid.

4 litigation matters on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
No recent annual reporting on the Strata Hub

We could not find a current annual return for this scheme on the NSW Strata Hub. That may just be a gap in the public data, but a non-reporting scheme can also signal a disengaged committee, ask for the last two AGM minutes.

Cost exposure

Moderate exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $600 per lot

Expected $5,000 per lot

Worst case $18,900 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Tribunal and legal costs 4 tribunal or court matters on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT). Scaled for: 4 matters.	$600	$5,000	$18,900
Total per lot	$600	$5,000	$18,900

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
What by-laws apply to pets, parking, short-stay letting, and renovations, and have any been disputed?

Because we found a by-law matter on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 4 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan SP 55773 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

Roden v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55773 [2021] NSWCATCD 61
By-laws NSWCATCD 30 August 2021

STRATA – keeping of animals by-law – challenge to its validity - whether parts of by-law enhance or preserve other lot owners' enjoyment or amenity in the scheme – relevant parts found not beyond power and not harsh unconscionable or oppressive
The Owners – Strata Plan No 55773 v Roden (Costs) [2020] NSWCATAP 197
Costs and procedure NSWCATAP 29 September 2020

COSTS – s 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – special circumstances – complexity of proceedings – issue not previously decided by Appeal Panel – overruling of previous first instance decision – costs of non-party application to be joined in appeal.
The Owners – Strata Plan No 55773 v Roden; Spiers v The Owners – Strata Plan No 77953 [2020] NSWCATAP 95
By-laws NSWCATAP 27 May 2020

LAND LAW – Strata title – Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, ss 136, 139,150 – By-laws – Power to make by-laws – By-law not to be harsh, unconscionable or oppressive – Whether by-laws prohibiting the keeping of animals and/or regulating the number of animals that can be kept is harsh, unconscionable or oppressive
Roden v The Owners-Strata Plan No 55773 [2019] NSWCATCD 61
By-laws NSWCATCD 18 September 2019

By-law banning all animals

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from NSW Caselaw (NCAT and the courts). The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Decisions, in detail

Read from each decision's own text: the parties and their roles, who presided, how it ended, and the money in play. Every row links to the source.

Roden v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55773 [2021] NSWCATCD 61
By-laws · Respondent successful Senior Member D Charles

The application to invalidate parts of By-Law 14 (Keeping an Animal) was dismissed as the applicant failed to establish that the by-law provisions were beyond power or harsh, unconscionable or oppressive.
- Robert Roden (lot owner)
- The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55773 (owners corp)

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	NSW Strata Hub	Stub only	Awaiting first run
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	4 matters	Direct	28 June 2026
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Checked, none found	Direct	28 June 2026
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.