Strata scheme UP 3704

UP 3704 · Registration date not recorded · Lot count not recorded · Australian Capital Territory checked 14 June 2026

Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.

1 tribunal or court matter, the most serious about building defects
$28,000 indicative cost exposure per lot, elevated band

The public record is a pre-screen, not the strata report. Read on for the detail, then obtain a strata records search before you bid.

Public record checked

Litigation, building-work orders, and governance for this scheme, the page you are on.
Read the strata report →
Paste the section 184 strata search or AGM minutes to see the fund balance and red flags the public registers can't. Obtain a strata records search if you do not have it yet.
Questions to ask
The specific questions this scheme's record raises, ready for the strata manager or your conveyancer.
Decide

Take the public record and the report findings to your conveyancer before you bid.

Risk read

What the public record shows for this scheme, read for a buyer. This is not the strata report, and a quiet record is not a guarantee: obtain a strata records search before you bid.

1 litigation matter on record

Tribunal and court decisions naming this scheme as a party. A litigious building is more likely to be carrying unresolved disputes, defects, or levy fights.
Water-ingress dispute on record

At least one matter touches water, ingress, or waterproofing, the single most common driver of strata special levies. Confirm whether it has been fully rectified.
Building-defect dispute on record

A matter touches building defects or rectification work. Ask whether the work is funded and whether the builder's warranty still applies.

Cost exposure

Elevated exposure

An indicative, itemised estimate of what one lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.

Good case $8,500 per lot

Expected $28,000 per lot

Worst case $90,000 per lot

Your lot's share versus an average lot 1.0×

Special levies are apportioned by unit entitlement. Set this from your contract; 1.0× is an average lot.

Exposure drivers, indicative per-lot ranges
Driver	Good	Expected	Worst
Serious building-defect rectification A building-defect dispute appears in this scheme's record. Indicative per-lot serious-defect rectification levies (NSW Serious Defects in Residential Apartments research report, 2021; strata special-levy reporting). Scaled for: 1 matter.	$8,000	$25,000	$80,000
Tribunal and legal costs 1 tribunal or court matter on the public record. Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).	$500	$3,000	$10,000
Total per lot	$8,500	$28,000	$90,000

Estimate only. Figures are indicative ranges from public remediation programs and reporting, apportioned to one lot; they are not this building's costed works and not financial advice. Obtain the capital works fund balance, any special levy resolved or proposed, and a strata records search before you transact.

Questions to ask before you bid

1
Has the water-ingress issue that went to the tribunal been fully rectified, and who paid for it?

Because we found a water/waterproofing dispute on record.
2
What is the capital works (sinking) fund balance, its adequacy ratio, and the 10-year plan?
3
Are any special levies raised, proposed, or scoped-but-not-yet-levied?
4
Can I see the last two years of AGM minutes, including any motions that were defeated?

Ask about this building

Ask a plain-English question and we'll answer from our record: litigation, building-work orders, water and defect matters, the managing agent, and more.

Save scheme Add to list Monitor

Save keeps this scheme on your dashboard. Monitoring tracks the matter count from 1 today; we'll flag new matters here as they appear.

Building record

Strata plan UP 3704 is on the register.

Location not mapped for this scheme yet. Map coverage is New South Wales today. Open the full map.

Litigation

THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN NO 3704 v MOORE (Unit Titles) [2025] ACAT 22
Building defects ACAT 9 April 2025

UNIT TITLES – where owners corporation claimed $1,803.04 for the cost of investigating, locating and rectifying a leaking hot water control valve assembly in the respondent’s unit and legal and debt recovery expenses totaling $21,524, as expenses incurred in carrying out the owners corporation’s functions that were necessary because of a willful or negligent act or omission, or breach of the owners corporation’s rules by the respondent under s 31 of the Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 (UTMA) – whether the hot water control valve assembly is common property – whether the hot water control valve assembly is a facility for the provision of a utility service for the potential benefit of all units and therefore the owners corporation responsibility to maintain under s 24(1)(e) of the UTMA – where hot water control valve assembly found to be unit property and therefore the respondent’s responsibility to maintain in a state of good repair in accordance with rule 1.3(1) of the default rules – whether legal and debt recovery expenses (including the costs of legal advice before taking legal action, the cost of representation by counsel at the hearing and strata manager’s fees charged in connection with the legal action) were reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount – where, save for the disallowance of some of the strata manager’s fees, the owners corporation was entitled to recover all of its legal and debt recovery expenses, including interest pursuant to s 94(1) of the UTMA List of Legislation: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 ss 8, 16, 48 Building Act 2004 ss 29, 42 Legal Profession Act 2006 s 300(2) Legislation Act 2001 s 132 Unit Titles Act 2001 ss 13, 34, 35 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 ss 31, 115, 125 Subordinate

Decisions naming this scheme as a party, from ACAT via AustLII. The line beneath each matter is the decision's own catchwords, quoted; the topic tag is our grouping of those words and reads "Other" when they do not clearly fit, so you can always check it against the source. Every matter links to the full decision. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.

Evidence ledger

Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.

Evidence ledger: what was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when it was last checked.
Checked	Found	Match	Last checked
Registry and parcel	Land registry	Stub only	Not harvested here yet
Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Litigation: NCAT and courts	1 matter	Direct	Not harvested here yet
Levies and financials	Not yet checked	Not matched	Not in the public record
Defects and building-work orders	Outside current coverage	Not matched	Not harvested here yet
Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated	Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme	Not matched	Never in the public record

What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear. The unknowns the public registers structurally cannot show stay named, so silence above is never read as a clean bill.

Deep report · coming soon

On top of the public record above, the deep report will add the scheme's minutes, financials, capital-works fund, and a defect inspection. We're building it. Leave your email and we'll tell you when it's ready.