Strata scheme UP 2839
UP 2839 Australian Capital Territory
Verdict
Public record: 1 tribunal matter. A reasonable pre-screen, but not the full picture, the financials and minutes that decide the purchase are in the report, not the registers. Read it, and obtain a strata records search, before you bid.
Cost exposure
Indicative, itemised estimate of what one average lot here could face, built only from this scheme's public-record signals. Indicative ranges, not this building's actual figures, and not financial advice.
Low- $3,000
Tribunal and legal costs
Indicative per-lot share of tribunal and legal costs in a strata dispute (NCAT).
Litigation · 1 matter
CRAVEN & GILKS v THE OWNERS - UNITS PLAN NO 2839 (Appeal) [2023] ACAT 4
Costs and procedure ACAT 13 January 2023
APPEAL – unit titles – unit owners installed wooden flooring in breach of the Owners Corporation Rules – Owners Corporation gave them an infringement notice – proceedings in tribunal for enforcement of infringement notice and compliance with the Rules – Original Tribunal ordered the unit owners to lodge new and compliant application for a hard floor, and to pay the Owners Corporation’s expenses of running the action once those expenses were quantified – appeal – whether Owners Corporation Rule 6.5 is invalid – whether the Rule is “harsh, unreasonable, or oppressive” – whether costs order was made in error – appellants applied to provide further evidence on appeal – relevant criteria – application refused – whether hearing of appeal should be de novo – appeal dismissed – substitute orders made Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 ss 7, 15, 16, 18, 22, 48, 82 Courts and Other Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 s 116 Land Titles (Unit Titles) Act 1970 Legislation Act 2001 s 112 Magistrates Court Act 1930 s 261 Strata Management Act 2015 (NSW) ss 136, 139 Unit Titles (Management) Act 2011 ss 16, 31, 35, 107, 108, 109, 127 Subordinate Legislation cited: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2020 r 91(c) Unit Titles (Management) Regulation 2011
Decisions naming this scheme, from ACAT via AustLII. The quoted line beneath each is the decision's own catchwords; the topic tag is our grouping of those words. Whether a matter helped or hurt the scheme is not assessed here.
Evidence ledger
Litigation-only record: this scheme is on file because a tribunal matter named its plan number, with no registry address, parcel, or map.
| Checked | Found | Match | Last checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registry and parcel | Land registry | Stub only | Not harvested here yet |
| Governance: AGM, managing agent, annual reporting | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Litigation: NCAT and courts | 1 matter | Direct | Not harvested here yet |
| Levies and financials | Not yet checked | Not matched | Not in the public record |
| Defects and building-work orders | Outside current coverage | Not matched | Not harvested here yet |
| Fund balances, current levies, minutes, defects not yet litigated | Not on the public record, and no registry entry for this scheme | Not matched | Never in the public record |
What was checked, what it found, how strong the match, and when each source last ran. A source that has not run here yet reads as not checked, never as checked and clear.